Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Code of Ethics01:29

Nursing Code of Ethics

The Nursing Code of Ethics sets the ethical benchmark for the profession, and guides nurses in ethical analysis and decision making at the societal, organizational, and clinical levels. The code encompasses showing compassion and respect for the patient, their families, and communities in all circumstances while committing to providing patient-centered care. In addition, the code states that nurses must advocate for the patient by defending a cause or recommendation to protect their rights,...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation01:08

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Nursing Ethical Principles I01:22

Nursing Ethical Principles I

Ethical principles serve as the moral compass in the longstanding tradition of nursing, guiding healthcare professionals in their interactions with patients and families. These principles, namely autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, provide a robust framework for navigating the ethical complexities of daily nursing practice.
Autonomy
Autonomy underscores the significance of a patient's self-determination and freedom from external control. In healthcare, respecting the...
Nursing Ethical Principles II01:27

Nursing Ethical Principles II

Ethical principles are essential in guiding nurses to fulfill their responsibilities, focusing on the quality of nursing care and decision-making. These principles, including autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, shape the ethical framework within healthcare settings.
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Twenty-eight years of experience measuring autonomy using the Dempster Practice Behavior Scale.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2020
Same author

Keywords matter: A critical factor in getting published work discovered.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2018
Same author

The vocabulary of science.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2018
Same author

Looking forward to better weather and cake.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2018
Same author

Retractions in nursing literature: Responsibilities of nurse authors, reviewers, and editors.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2018
Same author

Peer review and journal quality.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.1K

Peer Reviewing Papers for a Nursing Journal.

Charon A Pierson1

  • 1Charon A. Pierson is a consultant and freelance editor from Manchester, CT. She is the former editor-in-chief of the Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners . Contact author: charon.pierson@gmail.com . The author has disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

The American Journal of Nursing
|October 20, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Peer reviewers are crucial for manuscript decisions. This guide outlines key considerations for accepting review invitations and essential components for a constructive peer review report.

More Related Videos

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.8K
Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
08:47

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults

Published on: February 2, 2020

12.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.1K
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.8K
Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
08:47

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults

Published on: February 2, 2020

12.9K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific Publishing
  • Manuscript Review Process

Background:

  • Manuscript evaluation relies heavily on peer reviewer feedback.
  • Effective peer review is essential for maintaining scientific integrity and advancing research dissemination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To guide peer reviewers on accepting assignments.
  • To detail the critical elements of a comprehensive peer review.

Main Methods:

  • This article provides a descriptive overview of best practices for peer reviewers.
  • It synthesizes expert recommendations for manuscript evaluation.

Main Results:

  • Reviewers should assess their expertise and workload before accepting a review.
  • A thorough peer review report should include constructive criticism and highlight manuscript strengths and weaknesses.

Conclusions:

  • Adhering to these guidelines enhances the quality of peer review.
  • This supports editors in making informed decisions and improves scientific literature.