Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2025

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Assessment of the Left Ventricular Diastolic Function and Its Association with the Left Atrial Pressure in Patients
Mi-Na Kim1, Seong-Mi Park1, Hee-Dong Kim1
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
The current guidelines for diagnosing left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in atrial fibrillation patients may not accurately reflect elevated left atrial pressure. Diastolic parameters show limited value in paroxysmal AF.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Cardiac Electrophysiology
Background:
- Assessing left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in atrial fibrillation (AF) presents challenges.
- Current diagnostic algorithms for LV diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) may not fully capture elevated left atrial pressure (LAP) in AF patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic algorithm for LVDD in current guidelines.
- To assess the association between elevated LAP and LV diastolic parameters in AF patients.
Main Methods:
- 124 patients with non-valvular AF and preserved LV ejection fraction were analyzed.
- LV diastolic function was categorized using current guidelines.
- Elevated LAP was defined as mean LAP (mLAP) ≥15 mmHg, measured during catheter ablation.
Main Results:
- mLAP did not differ across LVDD severity groups, but increased LAP prevalence was higher in the LVDD group.
- Medial E/e' was the only LV diastolic parameter independently associated with mLAP overall.
- In persistent AF, E/e' and e' correlated with mLAP; in paroxysmal AF, mLAP associated with left atrial conduit function, not diastolic parameters.
Conclusions:
- The current LVDD diagnostic algorithm inadequately reflects elevated LAP in AF patients.
- LV diastolic parameters may help estimate elevated LAP in persistent AF but have limited utility in paroxysmal AF.
Background And Objectives:
The evaluation of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is challenging. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the diagnostic algorithm for LV diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in the current guidelines and to evaluate the association between increased left atrial pressure (LAP) and LV diastolic parameters.
Methods:
One hundred and twenty-four patients with non-valvular AF and a preserved LV ejection fraction who had the same rhythm status on echocardiography and LAP measurements during catheter ablation were included. LV diastolic function was classified as normal, indeterminate, or LVDD according to the recent guidelines. Increased LAP was defined as mean LAP (mLAP) ≥15 mmHg.
Results:
The mLAP was not different among the normal, indeterminate, and LVDD groups. However, the prevalence of increased LAP was higher in the LVDD group. Among the LV diastolic parameters, only medial E/e' was independently associated with mLAP in the whole study population. In patients with persistent AF (PeAF), E/e' and e' were significantly associated with mLAP, whereas in paroxysmal AF (PAF), mLAP was not associated with the LV diastolic parameters but with left atrial conduit function.
Conclusions:
In general, increased LAP is known to be closely related with LVDD. However, the algorithm for LVDD from recent guidelines does not reflect well the increased LAP in AF patients. The diastolic parameters may aid in estimating the increased LAP in PeAF but may only have limited value for assessing increased LAP in PAF.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization

