Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Insights From a Multicenter
Yae Min Park1, Jaemin Shim2, Mi Suk Cha1
1Division of Cardiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
Insights
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk markers are present in apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). Apical HCM patients with ICDs showed similar long-term outcomes to non-apical HCM patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Genetics
Background:
- Sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification in apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) requires further definition.
- Established SCD risk markers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) outcomes are not well-characterized in apical HCM.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate SCD risk markers in apical HCM patients with aborted cardiac arrest (ACA) or ventricular fibrillation (VF).
- To compare long-term ICD therapy outcomes between apical and non-apical HCM patients.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 96 HCM patients who underwent ICD implantation.
- Assessment of 2024 AHA/ACC and 2023 ESC guideline-recommended SCD risk markers in apical HCM patients with ACA/VF.
- Comparison of long-term ICD therapy outcomes between apical and non-apical HCM cohorts.
Main Results:
- Apical HCM patients (15.6%) with ACA/VF (46.7%) presented with at least one SCD risk marker.
- Common risk markers included late gadolinium enhancement, syncope, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, and left atrial enlargement.
- No significant differences in total or appropriate ICD therapy events were found between apical and non-apical HCM groups over ~6 years.
Conclusions:
- Apical HCM patients receiving ICDs for secondary prevention exhibit significant risk markers and remain at risk for ventricular arrhythmias.
- Risk-guided ICD implantation and diligent long-term follow-up are recommended for high-risk apical HCM patients.
Background And Objectives:
Prognosis and risk markers of sudden cardiac death (SCD) remain incompletely defined in patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). This study evaluated established SCD risk markers and compared long-term implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy outcomes between apical and non-apical HCM.
Methods:
We analyzed 96 patients with HCM who underwent ICD implantation at 3 tertiary care hospitals in Korea. All SCD risk markers recommended by the 2024 American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) and 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines were assessed in apical HCM patients who experienced aborted cardiac arrest (ACA) and/or documented ventricular fibrillation (VF). The long-term outcomes of ICD therapies between apical and non-apical HCM patients were evaluated.
Results:
Of the 15 patients (15.6%) with apical HCM, 7 (46.7%) experienced ACA and/or documented VF. All 7 patients had at least one SCD risk marker as defined by the 2024 AHA/ACC or 2023 ESC guidelines. The most common markers were late gadolinium enhancement, unexplained syncope, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, and left atrial enlargement. No significant differences were observed in total (33.3% [5/15] vs. 30.9% [25/81], p=1.00) or appropriate (13.3% [2/15] vs. 19.8% [16/81], p=0.73) ICD therapy events between patients with apical and non-apical HCM over a mean follow-up of 6.03±4.75 years.
Conclusions:
Patients with apical HCM who received ICDs for secondary prevention exhibited substantial risk markers at the index event and remained at risk for recurrent ventricular arrhythmias. These findings support risk-guided ICD implantation and careful long-term follow-up in patients with high-risk apical HCM.
More Related Videos
16:40A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification