Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2025

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
Published on: July 29, 2022
Powerful and interpretable control of false discoveries in two-group differential expression studies
Nicolas Enjalbert-Courrech1, Pierre Neuvial1
1Institut de Mathématiques de Toulouse, UMR 5219, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, F-31062 Toulouse Cedex 9, France.
Post hoc inference methods offer stronger guarantees for identifying false discoveries in differential expression analyses than standard false discovery rate (FDR) control. This study introduces adaptive methods for robust gene expression analysis.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Statistical Bioinformatics
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Standard differential expression (DE) analysis relies on controlling the false discovery rate (FDR), which lacks guarantees on the proportion of false discoveries.
- Existing FDR control methods offer limited statistical assurances, especially for subsets of selected genes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To demonstrate the effectiveness of adaptive interpolation-based post hoc inference methods for two-group differential expression studies.
- To address the limitations of FDR control by providing statistical guarantees on false discoveries.
Main Methods:
- Formalized permutation-based methods for sharp, gene-dependent confidence bounds.
- Developed a linear time algorithm for computing post hoc bounds, enabling large-scale DE studies.
- Introduced the Adaptive Simes bound for robust statistical inference.
Main Results:
- Adaptive post hoc methods provide reliable guarantees on the number or proportion of false discoveries.
- The Adaptive Simes bound demonstrated strong statistical performance in numerical experiments.
- Illustrated the application of the Adaptive Simes bound on a real RNA sequencing study.
Conclusions:
- Adaptive post hoc inference offers a statistically rigorous alternative to FDR control in DE analysis.
- The developed methods are computationally efficient and applicable to large-scale genomic data.
- Open-source implementation available in the R package 'sanssouci'.
Related Concept Videos
Bonferroni Test
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Controls in Experiments
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...

