Powerful and interpretable control of false discoveries in two-group differential expression studies
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2025

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
Published on: July 29, 2022
Nicolas Enjalbert-Courrech1, Pierre Neuvial1
1Institut de Mathématiques de Toulouse, UMR 5219, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, F-31062 Toulouse Cedex 9, France.
Motivation:
The standard approach for statistical inference in differential expression (DE) analyses is to control the false discovery rate (FDR). However, controlling the FDR does not in fact imply that the proportion of false discoveries is upper bounded. Moreover, no statistical guarantee can be given on subsets of genes selected by FDR thresholding. These known limitations are overcome by post hoc inference, which provides guarantees of the number of proportion of false discoveries among arbitrary gene selections. However, post hoc inference methods are not yet widely used for DE studies.
Results:
In this article, we demonstrate the relevance and illustrate the performance of adaptive interpolation-based post hoc methods for two-group DE studies. First, we formalize the use of permutation-based methods to obtain sharp confidence bounds that are adaptive to the dependence between genes. Then, we introduce a generic linear time algorithm for computing post hoc bounds, making these bounds applicable to large-scale two-group DE studies. The use of the resulting Adaptive Simes bound is illustrated on a RNA sequencing study. Comprehensive numerical experiments based on real microarray and RNA sequencing data demonstrate the statistical performance of the method.
Availability And Implementation:
A cross-platform open source implementation within the R package sanssouci is available at https://sanssouci-org.github.io/sanssouci/.
Supplementary Information:
Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Related Concept Videos
Bonferroni Test
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Controls in Experiments
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...

