Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2025

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
Published on: September 20, 2020
Individual differences in working memory capacity and conscious processing do not explain explicit and implicit
Marjan Kok1, Jennifer Nuij2, Elmar Kal3
1Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Explicit and implicit learning methods equally improved basketball layup skills in students. Individual differences in working memory or conscious processing did not affect learning outcomes in this physical education setting.
Area of Science:
- Motor Learning
- Educational Psychology
- Sports Science
Background:
- Understanding effective motor skill acquisition in adolescents is crucial for physical education.
- Explicit learning (conscious instruction) and implicit learning (learning without awareness) are two distinct approaches.
- Individual cognitive factors may influence the effectiveness of different learning methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of explicit versus implicit learning on basketball layup performance and self-efficacy in students.
- To investigate if verbal working memory capacity (WMC) and propensity for conscious motor processing (CMP) moderate these learning effects.
- To determine the optimal learning strategy for adolescents in a physical education context.
Main Methods:
- Eighty-one students (11-14 years old) participated in a three-week basketball layup training program.
- Participants were assigned to either an explicit or implicit learning condition during physical education classes.
- Verbal WMC and CMP propensity were measured, and layup performance and self-efficacy were assessed post-intervention.
Main Results:
- Both explicit and implicit learning groups showed significant improvements in layup performance, technique, and self-efficacy.
- No significant differences in learning outcomes were found between the explicit and implicit learning groups.
- Students' verbal WMC and CMP propensity did not differentially predict learning outcomes in either group.
Conclusions:
- In this physical education setting, both explicit and implicit learning methods were equally effective for improving basketball layup skills.
- Individual cognitive differences (WMC, CMP) did not appear to influence the effectiveness of these learning methods in this context.
- Further research is needed to identify conditions where individual cognitive factors may impact explicit versus implicit motor learning.
More Related Videos
09:05Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)
Published on: June 12, 2017
06:57Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
Published on: August 9, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Working Memory
Information Processing Approach
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Purposive Learning
Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory