Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

143
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
143
Reinforcement Schedules01:24

Reinforcement Schedules

229
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
229
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control01:07

Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control

166
Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
166
Reinforcement01:23

Reinforcement

311
Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
311
Feedback control systems01:26

Feedback control systems

382
Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
382
Operant Conditioning01:21

Operant Conditioning

1.7K
Operant conditioning, a key concept in behavioral psychology, involves using reinforcement and punishment to alter the likelihood of a behavior being repeated. B.F. introduced this type of conditioning. Skinner focused on voluntary behaviors and the consequences that follow them, influencing whether these behaviors will be strengthened or diminished.
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
1.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Phase-separated porous nanocomposite with ultralow percolation threshold for wireless bioelectronics.

Nature nanotechnology·2024
Same author

Imaging neuro-urodynamics of mouse major pelvic ganglion with a micro-endoscopic approach.

Journal of neurophysiology·2023
Same author

Imaging Mitochondrial Ca2+ Uptake in Astrocytes and Neurons using Genetically Encoded Ca2+ Indicators (GECIs).

Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE·2022
Same author

Widespread functional opsin transduction in the rat cortex via convection-enhanced delivery optimized for horizontal spread.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2017
Same author

Cerebellar granule cells acquire a widespread predictive feedback signal during motor learning.

Nature neuroscience·2017
Same author

Transparent intracortical microprobe array for simultaneous spatiotemporal optical stimulation and multichannel electrical recording.

Nature methods·2015

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 24, 2025

Rodent Brain Microinjection to Study Molecular Substrates of Motivated Behavior
10:05

Rodent Brain Microinjection to Study Molecular Substrates of Motivated Behavior

Published on: September 16, 2015

14.5K

A neural network model for timing control with reinforcement.

Jing Wang1, Yousuf El-Jayyousi1, Ilker Ozden1

  • 1Department of Biomedical, Biological, and Chemical Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.

Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
|October 24, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study models trial-and-error learning using recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to explain how reward feedback adjusts motor variability for exploration and exploitation. The model captures temporal correlations and feedback-driven adjustments in motor timing.

Keywords:
human behavior analysismotor controlmotor timingneural variabilityrecurrent neural networkreinforcement learningtime series model

More Related Videos

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments
09:43

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

10.7K
Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

10.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 24, 2025

Rodent Brain Microinjection to Study Molecular Substrates of Motivated Behavior
10:05

Rodent Brain Microinjection to Study Molecular Substrates of Motivated Behavior

Published on: September 16, 2015

14.5K
A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments
09:43

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

10.7K
Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

10.4K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Humans and animals face infinite possibilities in trial-and-error learning.
  • Previous work described a reward-sensitive Gaussian process (RSGP) for motor timing variability but lacked a neurobiological basis.
  • A mechanistic model is needed to explain how neural circuits use reward feedback to adjust motor variability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a mechanistic model of trial-and-error learning using recurrent neural networks (RNNs).
  • To investigate how reward feedback influences motor variability in a Bayesian framework.
  • To explore the trade-off between exploration and exploitation in continuous state control.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized recurrent neural networks (RNNs) architecture to model motor timing.
  • Introduced reward-dependent variability in network connectivity, inspired by synaptic transmission.
  • Simulated the process within a Bayesian framework to generate output sequences.

Main Results:

  • The RNN model successfully generated temporal structures of motor variability, balancing exploration and exploitation.
  • The model captured both long-term correlations (memory drifts) and short-term adjustments (feedback-driven).
  • The model estimated outcome uncertainty, distinguishing task-relevant variability from unexplained variability.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed artificial neural network model provides a neurobiologically plausible mechanism for reward-modulated motor variability.
  • This framework extends brain-inspired reinforcement learning for continuous state control.
  • The model offers a better approach to understanding adjustable variability in learning and decision-making.