Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.5K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.5K
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

121
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
121
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

61.4K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
61.4K
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

57.0K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
57.0K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.6K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.6K
Frames01:30

Frames

601
Frames are essential components of various mechanical and structural systems used daily. These structures are known for their stability and ability to bear heavy loads. A frame is constructed using two-force and multi-force members, interconnected using pin joints. In contrast, trusses are made entirely of two-force members.
Frames are versatile and widely used in various applications such as structural supports for beams and columns, automobile chassis construction, and in the construction...
601

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Everyone I Don't Like Is Biased: Affective Evaluations and the Bias Blind Spot.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same author

Is generalization decay a fundamental law of psychology?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2024
Same author

Communicating uncertainty in national security intelligence: Expert and nonexpert interpretations of and preferences for verbal and numeric formats.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2022
Same author

Principal investigators over-optimistically forecast scientific and operational outcomes for clinical trials.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Mathematically aggregating experts' predictions of possible futures.

PloS one·2021
Same author

On measuring agreement with numerically bounded linguistic probability schemes: A re-analysis of data from Wintle, Fraser, Wills, Nicholson, and Fidler (2019).

PloS one·2021
Same journal

Institutions as cached computation for resource-rational negotiation.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Delegation to legitimate authority as a resource rational mechanism.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Moral cognition is contractualist, but does not work by simulating a bargaining process.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Contractarian partiality, contractualist impartiality, and the question of falsifiability.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

The veil and the deal: Bargaining between case-specific solutions and unknown rules.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Moral decision-making entails negotiation over the psychological mechanisms underlying decisions.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 24, 2025

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.1K

Framing, equivalence, and rational inference.

David R Mandel1

  • 1Intelligence, Influence, and Collaboration Section, Defence Research and Development Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3K 2C9, Canadadrmandel66@gmail.comhttps://sites.google.com/site/themandelian/home.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|October 25, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This commentary critiques Bermúdez's rational framing effects argument, highlighting flawed assumptions in framing experiments. Without valid assumptions, conclusions about framing effects and human rationality are unsupported.

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.8K
Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

4.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 24, 2025

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.1K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.8K
Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

4.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Decision-Making Research
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Framing effects are documented phenomena in decision-making.
  • Rational choice theory assumes consistent preferences regardless of presentation.
  • Bermúdez proposed framing effects can align with rational decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the validity of Bermúdez's argument for rational framing effects.
  • To identify and critique the underlying assumptions in framing experiments.
  • To question the inferences drawn about human rationality from framing studies.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of Bermúdez's theoretical claims.
  • Examination of the assumptions of extensional and semantic equivalence in framing experiments.
  • Logical assessment of inferences derived from framing paradigms.

Main Results:

  • Bermúdez's argument for rational framing effects is found unconvincing.
  • The assumptions of extensional and semantic equivalence are often problematic and inadequately addressed.
  • When these assumptions fail, inferences about framing effects and rationality are invalid.

Conclusions:

  • The study concludes that Bermúdez's case for rational framing effects is not supported.
  • Critiques highlight the necessity of validating frame equivalence in experimental designs.
  • Inferences about cognitive biases and rationality require careful consideration of experimental assumptions.