Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

118
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
118
Multicompartment Models: Overview01:14

Multicompartment Models: Overview

221
Multicompartment models are mathematical constructs that depict how drugs are distributed and eliminated within the body. They segment the body into several compartments, symbolizing various physiological or anatomical areas connected through drug transfer processes such as absorption, metabolism, distribution, and elimination.
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
221
Distributed Loads: Problem Solving01:21

Distributed Loads: Problem Solving

697
Beams are structural elements commonly employed in engineering applications requiring different load-carrying capacities. The first step in analyzing a beam under a distributed load is to simplify the problem by dividing the load into smaller regions, which allows one to consider each region separately and calculate the magnitude of the equivalent resultant load acting on each portion of the beam. The magnitude of the equivalent resultant load for each region can be determined by calculating...
697
Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving01:06

Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving

4.3K
In multiple dimensions, the conservation of momentum applies in each direction independently. Hence, to solve collisions in multiple dimensions, we should write down the momentum conservation in each direction separately. To help understand collisions in multiple dimensions, consider an example.
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...
4.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

738
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
738
One-Degree-of-Freedom System01:24

One-Degree-of-Freedom System

543
In mechanical engineering, one-degree-of-freedom systems form the basis of a wide range of electrical and mechanical components. Using these models, engineers can predict the behavior of various parts in a larger system, which gives them insight into how different forces interact with each other.
A one-degree-of-freedom system is defined by an independent variable that determines its state and behavior. One example of a one-degree-of-freedom system is a simple harmonic oscillator, such as a...
543

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Approximate Observation Weighted <i>â„“</i><sub>2/3</sub> SAR Imaging under Compressed Sensing.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Novel Deep Learning Network for Gait Recognition Using Multimodal Inertial Sensors.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 23, 2025

A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking
10:16

A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking

Published on: January 3, 2018

15.0K

Trajectory Modeling by Distributed Gaussian Processes in Multiagent Systems.

Dongjin Xin1, Lingfeng Shi1

  • 1School of Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|October 27, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a distributed Gaussian process for multi-agent systems to model complex environments. This data-driven approach enhances trajectory tracking by fusing local agent data without central coordination.

Keywords:
Lyapunov functiondata-driven approachdistributed Gaussian processesmodel predictive control (MPC)trajectory modeling

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.5K
Studying Cell Rolling Trajectories on Asymmetric Receptor Patterns
04:24

Studying Cell Rolling Trajectories on Asymmetric Receptor Patterns

Published on: February 13, 2011

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 23, 2025

A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking
10:16

A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking

Published on: January 3, 2018

15.0K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.5K
Studying Cell Rolling Trajectories on Asymmetric Receptor Patterns
04:24

Studying Cell Rolling Trajectories on Asymmetric Receptor Patterns

Published on: February 13, 2011

9.6K

Area of Science:

  • Robotics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Control Systems

Background:

  • Multi-agent systems face challenges in modeling complex environments with uncertainties and noise.
  • Data-driven methods like Gaussian processes are effective for characterizing model uncertainties.
  • Existing methods often require central coordination, limiting scalability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a distributed Gaussian process for robust trajectory modeling in multi-agent systems.
  • To address model uncertainties and noise disturbances through local information exchange.
  • To develop control strategies for both continuous-time and discrete-time system models.

Main Methods:

  • A distributed Gaussian process framework utilizing local measurements and neighbor data exchange.
  • Design of a control Lyapunov function for continuous-time model learning.
  • Application of a distributed model predictive control approach for discrete-time model learning.
  • Implementation of a Kullback-Leibler average consensus fusion algorithm for prediction fusion.

Main Results:

  • The proposed distributed Gaussian process effectively characterizes system models with uncertainties.
  • Successful trajectory tracking demonstrated through two illustrative examples.
  • Cooperative estimation of a common Gaussian process function achieved through local interactions.

Conclusions:

  • The distributed Gaussian process offers a robust and scalable solution for multi-agent trajectory modeling.
  • The developed control strategies enable effective learning of both continuous-time and discrete-time models.
  • The fusion algorithm ensures accurate aggregation of local predictions for enhanced system performance.