Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distinguishing Molecular and Histologic Glioblastomas Using Multiparametric MRI-Based Habitat Analysis.

Korean journal of radiology·2026
Same author

Clonal evolution and mutational trajectories of metastatic colorectal cancer shaped by anticancer therapies.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Metastasis-Directed Radiation Therapy for Oligometastatic Endometrial Cancer.

Advances in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Deep Learning for Survival Prediction in Glioblastoma: Time-dependent Model Interpretability Using MRI, Clinical, and Molecular Data.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2026
Same author

Topological resilience of EEG-based functional networks during virtual reality-induced emotional states.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same author

Tumor habitat analysis using multiparametric MRI as a noninvasive correlate of longitudinal changes in telomerase activity in recurrent IDH-wildtype glioblastoma.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures
05:33

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Published on: November 14, 2019

7.2K

Brain Age Prediction: A Comparison between Machine Learning Models Using Brain Morphometric Data.

Juhyuk Han1, Seo Yeong Kim1, Junhyeok Lee1

  • 1Department of Software Convergence, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Korea.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|October 27, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Predicting brain age using machine learning is crucial for detecting abnormal aging. Regularized linear regression models perform comparably to complex algorithms, offering a computationally efficient approach for brain age prediction.

Keywords:
brain age predictionbrain morphometrymachine learningstructural magnetic resonance imaging

More Related Videos

Whole-brain Segmentation and Change-point Analysis of Anatomical Brain MRI&#8212;Application in Premanifest Huntington's Disease
09:06

Whole-brain Segmentation and Change-point Analysis of Anatomical Brain MRI—Application in Premanifest Huntington's Disease

Published on: June 9, 2018

12.2K
3D Modeling of the Lateral Ventricles and Histological Characterization of Periventricular Tissue in Humans and Mouse
15:26

3D Modeling of the Lateral Ventricles and Histological Characterization of Periventricular Tissue in Humans and Mouse

Published on: May 19, 2015

14.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures
05:33

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Published on: November 14, 2019

7.2K
Whole-brain Segmentation and Change-point Analysis of Anatomical Brain MRI&#8212;Application in Premanifest Huntington's Disease
09:06

Whole-brain Segmentation and Change-point Analysis of Anatomical Brain MRI—Application in Premanifest Huntington's Disease

Published on: June 9, 2018

12.2K
3D Modeling of the Lateral Ventricles and Histological Characterization of Periventricular Tissue in Humans and Mouse
15:26

3D Modeling of the Lateral Ventricles and Histological Characterization of Periventricular Tissue in Humans and Mouse

Published on: May 19, 2015

14.2K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Machine Learning
  • Aging Research

Background:

  • Brain structural morphology changes with age, making brain age prediction vital for identifying atypical aging patterns.
  • Neuroimaging-derived brain age quantifies brain health by measuring deviation from normative aging trajectories.
  • Machine learning (ML) offers potential for accurate brain age prediction but faces challenges due to algorithm diversity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of various ML models in estimating brain age from structural MRI morphometric data.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of different algorithms across independent datasets.
  • To identify computationally efficient ML models for reliable brain age prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated 27 ML models using structural MRI data from three independent cohorts: HCP (n=1113), Cam-CAN (n=601), and IXI (n=567).
  • Assessed model performance via cross-validation and an independent test set within each dataset.
  • Calculated mean absolute error (MAE) and Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) to measure prediction accuracy.

Main Results:

  • Model performance varied significantly, highlighting the impact of algorithm choice on brain age prediction accuracy.
  • Achieved MAE ranging from 2.75-3.12 years (HCP), 7.08-10.50 years (Cam-CAN), and 8.04-9.86 years (IXI).
  • Regularized linear regression models demonstrated performance comparable to nonlinear and ensemble methods across all datasets, with lower computational cost.

Conclusions:

  • Regularized linear regression algorithms are as effective as more complex ML models for brain age prediction.
  • The choice of ML model significantly influences brain age prediction outcomes.
  • Findings provide a quantitative reference for selecting efficient ML models for brain morphometric data analysis in aging research.