Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Artificial intelligence augments detection accuracy of cardiac insertable cardiac monitors: Results from a pilot
Fabio Quartieri1, Manuel Marina-Breysse2,3,4, Annalisa Pollastrelli5
1Department of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Background:
Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are indicated for long-term monitoring of patients with unexplained syncope or who are at risk for cardiac arrhythmias. The volume of ICM-transmitted information may result in long data review times to identify true and clinically relevant arrhythmias.
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether artificial intelligence (AI) may improve ICM detection accuracy.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients implanted with the Confirm RxTM ICM (Abbott) and followed in a prospective observational study. This device continuously monitors subcutaneous electrocardiograms (SECGs) and transmits to clinicians information about detected arrhythmias and patient-activated symptomatic episodes. All SECGs were classified by expert electrophysiologists and by the WillemTM AI algorithm (IDOVEN).
Results:
During mean follow-up of 23 months, of 20 ICM patients (mean age 68 ± 12 years; 50% women), 19 had 2261 SECGs recordings associated with cardiac arrhythmia detections or patient symptoms. True arrhythmias occurred in 11 patients: asystoles in 2, bradycardias in 3, ventricular tachycardias in 4, and atrial tachyarrhythmias (atrial tachycardia/atrial fibrillation [AT/AF]) in 10; with 6 patients having >1 arrhythmia type. AI algorithm overall accuracy for arrhythmia classification was 95.4%, with 97.19% sensitivity, 94.52% specificity, 89.74% positive predictive value, and 98.55% negative predictive value. Application of AI would have reduced the number of false-positive results by 98.0% overall: 94.0% for AT/AF, 87.5% for ventricular tachycardia, 99.5% for bradycardia, and 98.8% for asystole.
Conclusion:
Application of AI to ICM-detected episodes is associated with high classification accuracy and may significantly reduce health care staff workload by triaging ICM data.
Related Concept Videos
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring

