Cardiovascular Responses to Nasal Stimulation Under Ethmoidal-Maxillary Nerve Block and Lidocaine Gel in Anesthetized
Hyunseok Kim1, Won-Gyun Son1, Min Jang1
1Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences (H.K., W.-g.S., M.J., D.K., D.S., J.K.), College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
This study aimed to compare the effect of ethmoidal-maxillary nerve block (EMBLOCK) and topical application of 2% lidocaine gel (LGEL) on cardiovascular variables (heart rate and arterial blood pressure) during mechanical stimulation of the nasal cavity. The working hypothesis was that both techniques (EMBLOCK and LGEL) similarly blunt the cardiovascular responses to the stimulation. Six beagles were anesthetized using alfaxalone and isoflurane on three occasions with each treatment (EMBLOCK, LGEL, and control) in random order. The nasal cavity from the nose tip to the medial canthus was stimulated with a standard-tip cotton swab, and cardiovascular variables were recorded before and after stimulation. The maximum increases in heart rate and blood pressure were significantly smaller in EMBLOCK and LGEL than in the control. There was no significant difference between EMBLOCK and LGEL. Therefore, although further clinical studies are required, EMBLOCK and LGEL can be used because both EMBLOCK and LGEL attenuated the cardiovascular response to mechanical stimulation of the nasal cavity in dogs.
