Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses
Published on: November 10, 2023
Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review
Dhekra Chebil1,2,3, Donia Ben Hassine2,4, Sarra Melki2,4
1Infection Prevention Control Department, Ibn Al Jazzar University Hospital, Kairouan, Tunisia.
Implementing combined distancing measures early, like quarantine and school closures, effectively mitigates epidemics by reducing transmission rates. However, these public health interventions can cause adverse psychological and economic effects.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Health Policy
Background:
- Distancing measures are critical for mitigating epidemics.
- Understanding the typology, effectiveness, and side effects of these measures is essential for public health preparedness.
- Previous epidemics like the 2009 influenza A and the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic highlight the importance of distancing strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the typology, effectiveness, and side effects of distancing rules during epidemics.
- To provide evidence-based insights for developing future epidemic response plans.
Main Methods:
- A scoping review was conducted using electronic searches of MEDLINE and PubMed.
- Keywords included "social isolation," "social distancing," "quarantine," and "epidemics."
- The PRISMA-ScR statement guided the reporting of the review, including 93 studies from an initial 314 titles.
Main Results:
- Distancing measures were categorized into case-based and community-based interventions.
- Combined measures (school closure, home working, isolation, quarantine) effectively reduced the basic reproduction number (R 0 ) and flattened epidemic curves.
- Early and high-rate implementation of combined interventions, alongside other non-pharmaceutical measures, demonstrated greater effectiveness.
- Isolation and quarantine were effective in reducing the attack rate during the 2009 Influenza pandemic but posed a risk of household transmission.
- Lockdowns in the COVID-19 pandemic significantly reduced R 0 and increased doubling time.
- School closure and workplace distancing showed moderate effectiveness as single interventions.
- Adverse effects included psychological disorders, unhealthy behaviors, economic disruption, social discrimination, and stigmatization.
Conclusions:
- Combined distancing measures, when implemented early and comprehensively, are effective in controlling epidemic outbreaks.
- The judicious application of these measures is crucial to maximize benefits and minimize adverse community effects.
- Evidence-based strategies are vital for informing decision-makers and strengthening national capacities for future epidemic preparedness.
Related Concept Videos
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Introduction to Epidemiology
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...

