Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
Hip Magnetic Resonance Arthrography Using Normal Saline Is Less Accurate Than Using a Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent
Guen Young Lee1, Sujin Kim2, Yong-Chan Ha3
1Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
Gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) hip MR arthrography demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy for intra-articular pathologies compared to normal saline (NS) hip MR arthrography. GBCA hip MR arthrography is recommended for improved detection of hip joint abnormalities.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Orthopedic Imaging
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Hip magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography is a key imaging modality for diagnosing intra-articular hip pathologies.
- Evaluating the diagnostic performance of different contrast agents is crucial for optimizing imaging protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic performance of hip MR arthrography using gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) versus normal saline (NS) for intra-articular pathologies.
- To assess the reliability of these imaging techniques in detecting labral tears, cartilage abnormalities, and ligamentum teres tears.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 37 patients (38 hips) who underwent GBCA-hip MR arthrography and 30 patients (30 hips) who underwent NS-hip MR arthrography.
- Independent evaluation of MR images by two blinded radiologists for labral tears, cartilage abnormalities, and ligamentum teres tears.
- Diagnostic performance was compared against arthroscopic findings, with intra- and inter-reader reliability assessed using kappa values.
Main Results:
- Intra-reader reliability ranged from moderate to almost perfect (k = 0.510–0.840), and inter-reader reliability ranged from moderate to substantial (k = 0.441–0.695) for both techniques.
- Diagnostic accuracy for labral tears was 81.6–92.1% for GBCA and 66.7–73.3% for NS.
- Accuracy for cartilage abnormalities was 68.4–86.8% (GBCA) vs. 63.3–70.0% (NS), and for ligamentum teres tears was 68.4–76.3% (GBCA) vs. 50.0–56.7% (NS).
Conclusions:
- Normal saline (NS)-hip MR arthrography may be less accurate than gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA)-hip MR arthrography for diagnosing intra-articular hip pathologies.
- GBCA-hip MR arthrography demonstrates superior diagnostic performance, particularly for labral and ligamentum teres tears.
- The findings support the use of GBCA for enhanced diagnostic yield in hip MR arthrography.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

