Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025
Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
Published on: November 30, 2022
Ensemble learning and personalized training for the improvement of unsupervised deep learning-based synthetic CT
Sven Olberg1,2, Byong Su Choi1,3, Inkyung Park1,3
1Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Background:
The growing adoption of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiation therapy (RT) platforms and a focus on MRI-only RT workflows have brought the technical challenge of synthetic computed tomography (sCT) reconstruction to the forefront. Unpaired-data deep learning-based approaches to the problem offer the attractive characteristic of not requiring paired training data, but the gap between paired- and unpaired-data results can be limiting.
Purpose:
We present two distinct approaches aimed at improving unpaired-data sCT reconstruction results: a cascade ensemble that combines multiple models and a personalized training strategy originally designed for the paired-data setting.
Methods:
Comparisons are made between the following models: (1) the paired-data fully convolutional DenseNet (FCDN), (2) the FCDN with the Intentional Deep Overfit Learning (IDOL) personalized training strategy, (3) the unpaired-data CycleGAN, (4) the CycleGAN with the IDOL training strategy, and (5) the CycleGAN as an intermediate model in a cascade ensemble approach. Evaluation of the various models over 25 total patients is carried out using a five-fold cross-validation scheme, with the patient-specific IDOL models being trained for the five patients of fold 3, chosen at random.
Results:
In both the paired- and unpaired-data settings, adopting the IDOL training strategy led to improvements in the mean absolute error (MAE) between true CT images and sCT outputs within the body contour (mean improvement, paired- and unpaired-data approaches, respectively: 38%, 9%) and in regions of bone (52%, 5%), the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR; 15%, 7%), and the structural similarity index (SSIM; 6%, <1%). The ensemble approach offered additional benefits over the IDOL approach in all three metrics (mean improvement over unpaired-data approach in fold 3; MAE: 20%; bone MAE: 16%; PSNR: 10%; SSIM: 2%), and differences in body MAE between the ensemble approach and the paired-data approach are statistically insignificant.
Conclusions:
We have demonstrated that both a cascade ensemble approach and a personalized training strategy designed initially for the paired-data setting offer significant improvements in image quality metrics for the unpaired-data sCT reconstruction task. Closing the gap between paired- and unpaired-data approaches is a step toward fully enabling these powerful and attractive unpaired-data frameworks.
