Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Small x Assumption02:20

The Small x Assumption

46.4K
If a reaction has a small equilibrium constant, the equilibrium position favors the reactants. In such reactions, a negligible change in concentration may occur if the initial concentrations of reactants are high and the Kc value is small. In such circumstances, the equilibrium concentration is approximately equal to its initial concentration.  This estimation can be used to simplify the equilibrium calculations by assuming that some equilibrium concentrations are equal to the initial...
46.4K
Theorems of Pappus and Guldinus: Problem Solving01:12

Theorems of Pappus and Guldinus: Problem Solving

782
Pappus and Guldinus's theorems are powerful mathematical principles that are used for finding the surface area and volume of composite shapes. For example, consider a cylindrical storage tank with a conical top. Finding the surface area or volume can be challenging for such complex shapes. These theorems are particularly useful in calculating the volume and surface area of such systems. Here, the cylindrical storage tank with a conical top can be broken down into two simple shapes: a...
782
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.4K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.4K
Parseval's Theorem01:18

Parseval's Theorem

608
Parseval's theorem is a fundamental concept in signal processing and harmonic analysis. It asserts that for a periodic function, the average power of the signal over one period equals the sum of the squared magnitudes of all its complex Fourier coefficients. This theorem, named after Marc-Antoine Parseval, provides a powerful tool for analyzing the energy distribution in signals.
Interestingly, Parseval's theorem also holds for the trigonometric form of the Fourier series, which...
608
Thevinin's Theorem01:15

Thevinin's Theorem

726
Thévenin's theorem plays a pivotal role in electrical circuit analysis, offering a solution to the challenges posed by variable loads within a circuit. In practical applications, it is common to encounter circuits where certain elements remain fixed while others fluctuate, often referred to as the "load." A typical household electrical outlet serves as a prime example of a variable load, as it can be connected to a variety of appliances, each with its own unique electrical...
726
Theorems of Pappus and Guldinus01:10

Theorems of Pappus and Guldinus

2.1K
The two theorems developed by Pappus and Guldinus are widely used in mathematics, engineering, and physics to find the surface area and volume of any body of revolution. This is done by revolving a plane curve around an axis that does not intersect the curve to find its surface area or revolving a plane area around a non-intersecting axis to calculate its volume.
For finding the surface area, consider a differential line element that generates a ring with surface area dA when revolved.
2.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Quantum adversarial machine learning: from classical adaptations to quantum-native methods.

Artificial intelligence review·2026
Same journal

Super greedy trees.

Artificial intelligence review·2026
Same journal

Artificial neural networks fighting real neural decline: a systematic review of AI in Alzheimer's research.

Artificial intelligence review·2026
Same journal

Topological data analysis and topological deep learning beyond persistent homology: a review.

Artificial intelligence review·2026
Same journal

Advances in artificial intelligence: a review for the creative industries.

Artificial intelligence review·2026
Same journal

Exploring unanswerability in machine reading comprehension: approaches, benchmarks, and open challenges.

Artificial intelligence review·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 22, 2025

A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow
11:39

A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow

Published on: August 13, 2012

14.6K

A formal proof and simple explanation of the QuickXplain algorithm.

Patrick Rodler1

  • 1University of Klagenfurt: Alpen-Adria-Universitat Klagenfurt, Universitätsstr. 65-67, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria.

Artificial Intelligence Review
|November 7, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This paper presents the first formal proof of correctness for Ulrich Junker's QuickXplain algorithm, a method for finding irreducible subsets. The proof enhances understanding and trust in the algorithm

Keywords:
AlgorithmComputation of JustificationsConflict ComputationConstraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP)Correctness ProofFind Irreducible Subset with Monotone PropertyMinimal Correction SubsetMinimal Set Subject to a Monotone Predicate (MSMP)Minimal Unsatisfiable SubsetModel-Based DiagnosisOntology Debugging and RepairProof to ExplainQuickXplainRelaxation of Overconstrained Problems

More Related Videos

Quick Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Protocol for Xist RNA Combined with Immunofluorescence of Histone Modification in X-chromosome Inactivation
12:42

Quick Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Protocol for Xist RNA Combined with Immunofluorescence of Histone Modification in X-chromosome Inactivation

Published on: November 26, 2014

14.1K
Development of a Quantitative Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay with an Internal Positive Control
08:37

Development of a Quantitative Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay with an Internal Positive Control

Published on: March 30, 2015

13.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 22, 2025

A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow
11:39

A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow

Published on: August 13, 2012

14.6K
Quick Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Protocol for Xist RNA Combined with Immunofluorescence of Histone Modification in X-chromosome Inactivation
12:42

Quick Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Protocol for Xist RNA Combined with Immunofluorescence of Histone Modification in X-chromosome Inactivation

Published on: November 26, 2014

14.1K
Development of a Quantitative Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay with an Internal Positive Control
08:37

Development of a Quantitative Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay with an Internal Positive Control

Published on: March 30, 2015

13.8K

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Algorithm Analysis
  • Formal Methods

Background:

  • The QuickXplain algorithm, proposed in 2004, is a divide-and-conquer strategy for identifying irreducible subsets with specific properties.
  • It has broad applications in constraint satisfaction, model-based diagnosis, recommender systems, verification, and the Semantic Web.
  • Despite its popularity and efficiency, a formal proof of its correctness has been lacking, leading to comprehension difficulties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide the first formal proof of correctness for the QuickXplain algorithm.
  • To offer a clear and understandable explanation of the algorithm's workings through its proof.
  • To establish a foundation for verifying systems that utilize QuickXplain.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a novel, formally verified explanation of the QuickXplain algorithm.
  • Presentation of an intelligible formal proof demonstrating the algorithm's correctness.
  • Methodology designed for potential transferability to proving other recursive algorithms.

Main Results:

  • A formal proof of correctness for the QuickXplain algorithm is successfully presented.
  • The proof clarifies the algorithm's operational principles, aiding understanding and trust.
  • The methodology facilitates gapless correctness proofs for systems dependent on QuickXplain.

Conclusions:

  • The formal proof confirms the correctness of the QuickXplain algorithm.
  • The proof serves didactic, transfer, and completeness purposes, enhancing its utility.
  • This work establishes a trusted foundation for the widespread application of QuickXplain.