Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025
Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy
Published on: October 25, 2024
Review of Vaginal Approaches to Apical Prolapse Repair
Lannah L Lua-Mailland1, Shannon L Wallace2, Fatima A Khan3
1Section of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Obstetrics/Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A81, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. lual@ccf.org.
Purpose Of Review:
To review recent literature and provide up-to-date knowledge on new and important findings in vaginal approaches to apical prolapse surgery.
Recent Findings:
Overall prolapse recurrence rates following transvaginal apical prolapse repair range from 13.7 to 70.3% in medium- to long-term follow-up, while reoperation rates for prolapse recurrence are lower, ranging from 1 to 35%. Subjective prolapse symptoms remain improved despite increasing anatomic failure rates over time. The majority of studies demonstrated improvement in prolapse-related symptoms and quality of life in over 80% of patients 2-3 years after transvaginal repair, with similar outcomes with and without uterine preservation. Contemporary studies continue to demonstrate the safety of transvaginal native tissue repair with most adverse events occurring within the first 2 years. Transvaginal apical prolapse repair is safe and effective. It is associated with long-term improvement in prolapse-related symptoms and quality of life despite increasing rates of prolapse recurrence over time. Subjective outcomes do not correlate with anatomic outcomes.
