Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025

09:29
A Standardized Obstacle Course for Assessment of Visual Function in Ultra Low Vision and Artificial Vision
Published on: February 11, 2014
13.2K
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Tools in Very-Low Vision: Ready for Use in Trials?
Jan Henrik Terheyden1, David J Fink1, Susanne G Pondorfer1
1Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Pharmaceutics
|November 11, 2022
Summary
Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) assessments offer a promising alternative to traditional visual function tests for vision restoration trials. The Very Low Vision IADL (IADL-VLV) and Melbourne Low-Vision Activities of Daily Living Index (MLVAI) show the most potential for evaluating vision restoration outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Rehabilitation Science
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Traditional visual function assessments often lack sensitivity to detect improvements from vision restoration interventions.
- Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) offer a functional outcome measure relevant to patients with vision impairment.
- Several vision-specific IADL instruments exist, but their suitability for vision restoration trials requires evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review existing vision-specific IADL instruments for their utility in vision restoration trials.
- To present validation data for the most promising IADL instruments, specifically the Very Low Vision IADL (IADL-VLV).
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of vision-specific IADL instruments was conducted.
- Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, and construct validity were assessed for relevant instruments.
- The Very Low Vision IADL (IADL-VLV) was further validated in a low-vision clinic sample (n=51).
Main Results:
- Six instruments were identified: LVFSE, TIADL, MLVAI, ADREV, FLORA, and IADL-VLV.
- The IADL-VLV demonstrated high test-retest reliability (ICC=0.981).
- The MLVAI and IADL-VLV were specifically developed for ultra-low vision contexts and showed better reliability than LVFSE. Ceiling effects were noted across instruments.
Conclusions:
- The IADL-VLV and MLVAI are the most suitable IADL instruments for vision restoration trials, including those involving gene therapy or visual prostheses for inherited retinal diseases.
- Further validation of these instruments is necessary to confirm their efficacy in diverse patient populations and intervention types.

