Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

475
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
475
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

700
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
700
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

559
There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
559

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Performance Evaluation and Error Mitigation of Ultrasonic Indoor Positioning: An ESP32-Based IMU-ESKF Architecture.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Low-Cost Portable Sensor Node for Gas and Chemical Leak Detection with Kalman-Filtering-Based UWB Localization.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Human-Robot Interaction in Indoor Mobile Robotics: Current State, Interaction Modalities, Applications, and Future Challenges.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Scalable, Flexible, and Affordable Hybrid IoT-Based Ambient Monitoring Sensor Node with UWB-Based Localization.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Ambient Monitoring Portable Sensor Node for Robot-Based Applications.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Strategies for automating analytical and bioanalytical laboratories.

Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer
05:00

Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer

Published on: July 26, 2024

574

Evaluating a Novel Gas Sensor for Ambient Monitoring in Automated Life Science Laboratories.

Mohammed Faeik Ruzaij Al-Okby1,2, Thomas Roddelkopf3, Heidi Fleischer3

  • 1Technical Institute of Babylon, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University (ATU), Kufa 54003, Iraq.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|November 11, 2022
PubMed
Summary

A new IoT sensor node using the SGP41 MOX sensor effectively detects hazardous gas leaks, including nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), crucial for lab safety.

Keywords:
gas sensorshazardous gasesindoor air quality (IAQ)internet of things (IoT)nitrogen oxide index (NOx-Index)volatile organic compounds index (VOC-index)

More Related Videos

Microalgae Cultivation and Biomass Quantification in a Bench-Scale Photobioreactor with Corrosive Flue Gases
08:41

Microalgae Cultivation and Biomass Quantification in a Bench-Scale Photobioreactor with Corrosive Flue Gases

Published on: December 19, 2019

10.3K
Chemiluminescence-based Assays for Detection of Nitric Oxide and its Derivatives from Autoxidation and Nitrosated Compounds
08:23

Chemiluminescence-based Assays for Detection of Nitric Oxide and its Derivatives from Autoxidation and Nitrosated Compounds

Published on: February 16, 2022

4.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer
05:00

Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer

Published on: July 26, 2024

574
Microalgae Cultivation and Biomass Quantification in a Bench-Scale Photobioreactor with Corrosive Flue Gases
08:41

Microalgae Cultivation and Biomass Quantification in a Bench-Scale Photobioreactor with Corrosive Flue Gases

Published on: December 19, 2019

10.3K
Chemiluminescence-based Assays for Detection of Nitric Oxide and its Derivatives from Autoxidation and Nitrosated Compounds
08:23

Chemiluminescence-based Assays for Detection of Nitric Oxide and its Derivatives from Autoxidation and Nitrosated Compounds

Published on: February 16, 2022

4.3K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Chemical Engineering
  • Sensor Technology

Background:

  • Automated chemical and life science laboratories face risks from hazardous gas leaks.
  • Exposure to pollutants like nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) poses health risks.
  • Rapid detection and response are critical to mitigate harmful effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and test an IoT environmental sensor node for detecting hazardous gas leakages.
  • To evaluate the performance of a commercial MOX gas sensor (SGP41) for detecting NOx and VOCs.
  • To assess the impact of concentration, volume, and distance on sensor response and recovery times.

Main Methods:

  • Integrated a commercial MOX gas sensor (SGP41) into an IoT sensor node.
  • Conducted tests to detect varying concentrations, volumes, and leakage distances of NOx and VOCs.
  • Compared sensor performance across different parameters and sensors within the node.

Main Results:

  • The SGP41 sensor successfully detected nitrogen oxide index (NOx-Index) and volatile organic compound index (VOC-Index).
  • The system detected nitrogen dioxide (NO2) gas leakage as low as 0.3% volume.
  • All tested volatile organic compound (VOC) solvents were detected at volumes of 100 µL or greater.

Conclusions:

  • The developed IoT sensor node with the SGP41 sensor is effective for hazardous gas detection in laboratory environments.
  • The system demonstrates capability in identifying small gas leakages, enhancing safety protocols.
  • The sensor's performance validates its suitability for monitoring critical air pollutants in specialized settings.