Empirical comparison of routinely collected electronic health record data for head and neck cancer-specific survival
Damian P Kotevski1,2, Robert I Smee1,2,3, Claire M Vajdic4,5
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital and Community Health Services, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Background:
Knowledge of the prognostic factors and performance of machine learning predictive models for 2-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) is limited in the head and neck cancer (HNC) population.
Methods:
Data from our facilities' oncology information system (OIS) collected for routine practice (OIS dataset, n = 430 patients) and research purposes (research dataset, n = 529 patients) were extracted on adults diagnosed between 2000 and 2017 with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Results:
Machine learning demonstrated excellent performance (area under the curve, AUC) in the whole cohort (AUC = 0.97, research dataset), larynx cohort (AUC = 0.98, both datasets), and oropharynx cohort (AUC = 0.99, both datasets). Tumor site and T classification were identified as predictors of 2-year CSS in both datasets. Hypothyroidism and fitness for operation were further identified in the research dataset.
Conclusions:
Datasets extracted from an OIS for routine clinical practice and research purposes demonstrated high utility for informing 2-year head and neck CSS.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Kaplan-Meier Approach


