Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2025
14:43
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
11.9K
An evaluation of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: lessons learned from SWOG S1415CD
Ari Bell-Brown1, Kate Watabayashi1, Karma Kreizenbeck1
1Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
|November 15, 2022
Summary
A framework successfully evaluated stakeholder engagement in a pragmatic trial, identifying respect and feedback as key successes. The study highlights the need for diverse participation in research engagement.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Comparative Effectiveness Research
Background:
- Stakeholder engagement is crucial for comparative effectiveness research (CER).
- Existing definitions of successful stakeholder engagement in CER are lacking.
- A framework by Lavallee et al. provides criteria for effective engagement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate stakeholder engagement during a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial using a defined framework.
- To identify specific criteria contributing to effective stakeholder engagement in research.
Main Methods:
- A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial was conducted.
- Semi-structured interviews, based on the Lavallee et al. framework, were used.
- Interview data were analyzed deductively to identify themes related to engagement criteria.
Main Results:
- Thirteen members participated in the interviews.
- Effective engagement themes included respect for ideas, consensus-building time, information access, and feedback.
- A primary criticism identified was the lack of diversity among participants.
Conclusions:
- The utilized framework effectively evaluated stakeholder engagement.
- Positive feedback centered on respect, trust, and competence, leading to best practice recommendations.
- Standardized frameworks are valuable for formally assessing and improving stakeholder engagement in research.
Keywords:
comparative effectiveness researchpragmatic trialstakeholder engagementstakeholder evaluationMore Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
8.4K
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
3.8K
Related Concept Videos
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
157
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
157
01:20Study Designs in Epidemiology
356
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
356
01:11Clinical Trials: Overview
3.1K
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
3.1K
01:16Bioequivalence: Overview
1.2K
Pharmaceutical equivalents, by definition, are drug products with the same active ingredient in the same quantities, encapsulated in identical dosage forms, and intended for the same administration routes. These pharmaceutical equivalents are deemed bioequivalent if the bioavailability of the active entity in the drug preparations is similar. Moreover, pharmaceutical equivalents demonstrating bioequivalence are also regarded as therapeutically equivalent. This means that when used as directed,...
1.2K
01:16Clinical Trials
6.9K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
6.9K
01:20Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
248
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
248