Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Endoscopic Ossiculoplasty – Techniques, Innovations, and Practical Guidance for Clinical Integration
Published on: January 26, 2024
Some good reasons to proceed with the occlusion of the auricle
Gavino Casu1,2, Pierluigi Merella1, Giovanni Lorenzoni1
1Complex Structure of Clinical and Interventional Cardiology, University Hospital of Sassari, Sassari.
Insights
Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high bleeding risk can benefit from left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). This procedure offers an alternative to oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT), reducing stroke risk and bleeding complications.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, significantly increasing the risk of cardio-embolic stroke.
- Oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) is the standard for preventing AF-related strokes, but is unsuitable for patients with high bleeding risk or contraindications.
- Some patients experience embolic events despite adequate OAT, necessitating alternative strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) as an alternative to OAT in specific AF patient populations.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of LAAC in reducing thromboembolic events and bleeding complications.
- To explore LAAC's role for patients with contraindications or inadequate response to OAT.
Main Methods:
- Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) was performed.
- Patient cohorts included those with high bleeding risk and those with embolic events despite OAT.
- Outcomes assessed included procedural safety, reduction in bleeding risk, and prevention of cardio-embolic events.
Main Results:
- LAAC proved to be an effective and safe interventional procedure.
- The procedure significantly reduced bleeding risks, potentially eliminating the need for long-term OAT.
- LAAC demonstrated efficacy in mitigating cardio-embolic risk associated with AF.
Conclusions:
- Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is a viable alternative to OAT for AF patients with contraindications or high bleeding risk.
- LAAC offers a significant reduction in bleeding complications compared to long-term OAT.
- Further research is needed to determine optimal post-LAAC antithrombotic therapy.
Abstract:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia. The most fearful complication of AF is represented by cardio-embolic stroke and 30% of ischaemic strokes are attributable to AF. The prevention of cardio-embolic risk is therefore based on oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT). Some categories of patients do not benefit from OAT. These are patients at increased bleeding risk and with varying degrees of contraindication to long-term anticoagulant therapy. On the opposite are those patients who develop an embolic event related to AF despite a well-conducted OAT. These types of patients benefit from an interventional approach, percutaneous closure of the left auricle (LAAO), aimed at eliminating what is the primary source of AF-related thrombo-embolism, precisely the left auricle. Percutaneous closure of the left auricle has proven to be an effective and safe procedure, significantly reducing the bleeding risks of patients who, after the procedure, will no longer have to take OAT. Furthermore, it has been shown to be effective in reducing cardio-embolic risk. Uncertainty still remains as to what is the optimal antithrombotic therapy after LAAO. In any case, LAAO represents a valid alternative to OAT for those patients in whom it is contraindicated or ineffective.
Related Concept Videos
The Auditory Ossicles
The aptly named stapes look very much like a stirrup. The three ossicles are unique to mammals, and each plays a role in...
Anatomy of the Ear

