Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Patient selection for complex, high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: an overview.
Vasileios Panoulas1,2, Ovidio De Filippo3,4, Matthias Bossard5,6
1Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, part of Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Hill End Road, UB9 6JH, Harefield, London, UK.
Complex, high-risk indicated PCI (CHIP) is emerging for patients unsuitable for surgery. Understanding CHIP risk factors like complex anatomy and comorbidities is crucial for selecting patients and optimizing outcomes with mechanical circulatory support.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has advanced significantly, yet coronary artery bypass grafting remains preferred for complex coronary artery disease.
- Many patients with complex disease are older with comorbidities, making them poor surgical candidates and increasing interest in less invasive options.
- This has led to the rise of complex, high-risk indicated PCI (CHIP) and protected PCI, especially for those needing mechanical circulatory support (MCS).
Purpose of the Study:
- To review contemporary evidence and consensus frameworks regarding CHIP.
- To delineate the multifactorial nature of CHIP risk.
- To organize key determinants of CHIP risk into distinct categories for better understanding and patient selection.
Main Methods:
- Synthesis of available contemporary evidence.
- Review of consensus frameworks.
- Organization of CHIP risk determinants into four categories: complex coronary anatomy, impaired hemodynamics, cardiac comorbidities, and non-cardiac comorbidities.
Main Results:
- CHIP involves anatomical complexity and heightened procedural risk due to hemodynamic compromise and patient comorbidities.
- Patient selection for MCS in CHIP relies heavily on observational data from registries, expert consensus, and institutional experience.
- Key determinants of CHIP risk include complex coronary anatomy, impaired hemodynamics, cardiac comorbidities, and non-cardiac comorbidities.
Conclusions:
- Understanding the multifactorial nature of CHIP risk is essential for decision-making.
- Identifying and categorizing risk factors aids in selecting appropriate patients for CHIP and MCS.
- Optimizing outcomes in this vulnerable population requires a comprehensive assessment of anatomical, hemodynamic, and comorbidity factors.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization