Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2025

09:51
Laparoscopic Anterior Right Hepatectomy: A Single-Center Experience
Published on: December 4, 2023
1.2K
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using Standard 5 mm Trocars: Single Pediatric Center Experience
Joe Rodriguez1, Michael Vogel1, Diana Fan1
1Department of Pediatric Surgery, SSM Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital, St. Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A
|November 16, 2022
Summary
Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) using standard instruments is noninferior to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) for uncomplicated appendicitis. This technique offers a shorter operative time without compromising patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Surgical Outcomes Research
- Pediatric Surgery
Background:
- Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) typically requires specialized equipment.
- Our institution employs SILA using standard laparoscopic instruments, reducing the need for specialized materials.
- Previous documentation exists for SILA, but further validation of its noninferiority with standard equipment is warranted.
Purpose of the Study:
- To demonstrate the noninferiority of our institution's SILA technique for uncomplicated appendicitis.
- To compare outcomes between SILA using standard instruments and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA).
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of SILA in a real-world clinical setting.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 128 patients who underwent SILA for uncomplicated appendicitis from 2011 to 2020.
- Exclusion of patients with perforated appendicitis.
- Matching SILA cases with up to three CLA controls based on age, gender, and weight using the Greedy match method.
Main Results:
- SILA demonstrated a significantly shorter operative time (27.2 minutes) compared to CLA (43.7 minutes) (P < .001).
- No significant difference was observed in mean length of stay (LOS) between SILA and CLA (42.4 hours vs. 42.4 hours, P = .88).
- Complication rates (5.4% vs. 8.5%, P = .06) and readmission rates (0.8% vs. 3.4%, P = .108) were comparable between the two groups.
Conclusions:
- Our SILA technique, utilizing standard laparoscopic instrumentation, is noninferior to CLA for treating uncomplicated appendicitis.
- The SILA approach resulted in a reduced operative time, suggesting potential efficiency gains.
- These findings support the use of SILA with standard equipment for selected patients, offering a viable alternative to CLA.

