Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2025

Recognition of Epidermal Transglutaminase by IgA and Tissue Transglutaminase 2 Antibodies in a Rare Case of Rhesus Dermatitis
Published on: December 15, 2011
Assessment of the causal association between celiac disease and cardiovascular diseases
1Clinical Laboratory Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Insights
This study found no causal link between celiac disease (CD) and major cardiovascular diseases. Mendelian randomization analysis confirmed that CD does not increase the risk of conditions like stroke, heart attack, or atrial fibrillation.
Area of Science:
- Genetics and Cardiovascular Health
- Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine
Background:
- Conflicting epidemiological data exists regarding the association between celiac disease (CD) and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).
- The causal relationship between CD and various CVDs remains largely undetermined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the potential causal association between celiac disease and a spectrum of cardiovascular diseases.
- Utilizing a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to assess causality.
Main Methods:
- Employed summary-level data from large genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for CD and multiple cardiovascular outcomes.
- Applied the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method for causal effect estimation.
- Conducted sensitivity analyses, including MR-Egger and weighted median methods, to ensure result robustness and assess pleiotropy.
Main Results:
- Mendelian randomization analysis revealed no statistically significant causal effect of genetically predicted celiac disease on ischemic stroke, large artery stroke, cardioembolic stroke, small vessel stroke, coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, angina, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, or venous thromboembolism.
- Sensitivity analyses corroborated the primary findings, indicating consistent results across different methodologies.
- No significant evidence of horizontal pleiotropy was detected, supporting the validity of the genetic instrumental variables used.
Conclusions:
- The study concludes that celiac disease is not causally associated with an increased risk of the investigated cardiovascular diseases.
- These findings suggest that observed associations in epidemiological studies may be due to confounding factors rather than a direct causal link.
Background:
Epidemiological studies have reported inconsistent results of the association between celiac disease (CD) and cardiovascular diseases. Moreover, the causality remains largely unknown. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether CD is causally associated cardiovascular diseases, including ischemic stroke, large artery stroke, cardioembolic stroke, small vessel stroke, coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, angina, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and venous thromboembolism using an mendelian randomization (MR) approach.
Methods:
Summary-level data for CD were derived from a large-sample genome-wide association study (GWAS) including 12,041 CD cases and 12,228 controls of European ancestry. The corresponding data for ischemic stroke (34,217 cases and 406,111 controls), large artery stroke (4,373 cases and 406,111 controls), cardioembolic stroke (7,193 cases and 406,111 controls), small vessel stroke (5,386 cases and 192,662 controls), coronary heart disease (22,233 cases and 64,762 controls), myocardial infarction (11,622 cases and 187,840 controls), angina (18,168 cases and 187,840 controls), heart failure (47,309 cases and 930,014 controls), atrial fibrillation (60,620 cases and 970,216 controls), and venous thromboembolism (9,176 cases and 209,616 controls) were obtained from the IEU GWAS database. We calculated the causal effect using the inverse variance weighted method. Sensitivity analyses and leave-one-out analyses were performed to ensure the consistency and robustness of causal estimates.
Results:
The MR inverse variance weighted estimates indicated no causal effect of genetically predicted CD on ischemic stroke (OR = 1.001, 95% CI: 0.984-1.018), large artery stroke (OR = 1.003, 95% CI: 0.961-1.048), cardioembolic stroke (OR = 1.009, 95% CI: 0.977-1.042), small vessel stroke (OR = 1.023, 95% CI: 0.981-1.066), coronary heart disease (OR = 0.995, 95% CI: 0.977-1.013), myocardial infarction (OR = 0.994, 95% CI: 0.959-1.030), angina (OR = 1.006, 95% CI: 0.981-1.032), heart failure (OR = 0.999, 95% CI: 0.982-1.016), atrial fibrillation (OR = 1.000, 95% CI: 0.990-1.011), and venous thromboembolism (OR = 1.001, 95% CI: 0.971-1.032). Sensitivity analyses using the MR-Egger, weighted median, and simple mode methods yielded similar results. No evidence of horizontal pleiotropy was identified (MR Pleiotropy Residual Sum and Outlier global test and MR-Egger intercept with P > 0.05).
Conclusion:
Our findings do not support a causal contribution of CD itself to ischemic stroke, large artery stroke, cardioembolic stroke, small vessel stroke, coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, angina, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and venous thromboembolism risk.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Autoimmune Disorders
Concept and Mechanism of Autoimmune Diseases
The immune...
Causality in Epidemiology
Other Disorders of Digestive System
Cause and Effect

