Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2025
Learning Modern Laryngeal Surgery in a Dissection Laboratory
Published on: March 18, 2020
Oncologic Outcomes After Clinically Node-Negative Salvage Laryngectomy
Jennifer H Gross1, Mihir R Patel1, Jeffrey M Switchenko2
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Importance:
Controversy exists regarding management of the clinically node-negative neck in patients with recurrent larynx or hypopharynx cancers who received total laryngectomy after definitive radiation with or without chemotherapy.
Objective:
To explore clinical and oncologic outcomes after elective neck dissection vs observation in patients who received clinically node-negative salvage total laryngectomy.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This cohort study was performed from January 2009 to June 2021 at a single, high-volume tertiary care center. Follow-up was conducted through June 2021 for all patients. Survival outcomes were based on at least 2 years of follow-up. Patients aged 18 years or older with recurrent, clinically node-negative larynx or hypopharynx tumors after definitive nonsurgical treatment who were treated with a salvage total laryngectomy were included. Data were analyzed from October 2021 through September 2022.
Exposures:
Elective neck dissection.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Presence and location of occult nodal metastasis in electively dissected necks, along with differences in fistula rates and overall and disease-free survival between patients receiving elective neck dissection vs observation.
Results:
Among 107 patients receiving clinically node-negative salvage total laryngectomy (median [IQR] age, 65.0 [57.8-71.3] years; 91 [85.0%] men), 81 patients underwent elective neck dissection (75.7%) and 26 patients underwent observation (24.3%). Among patients with elective neck dissection, 13 patients had occult nodal positivity (16.0%). Recurrent supraglottic (4 of 20 patients [20.0%]) or advanced T classification (ie, T3-T4; 12 of 61 patients [19.7%]) had an occult nodal positivity rate of 20% or more, and positive nodes were most likely to occur in levels II and III (II: 6 of 67 patients [9.0%]; III: 6 of 65 patients [9.2%]; VI: 3 of 44 patients [6.8%]; IV: 3 of 62 patients [4.8%]; V: 0 of 4 patients; I: 0 of 18 patients). There was a large difference in fistula rate between elective neck dissection (12 patients [14.8%]) and observed (8 patients [30.8%]) groups (difference, 16.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -3.4 to 35.3 percentage points), while the difference in fistula rate was negligible between 50 patients undergoing regional or free flap reconstruction (10 patients [20.0%]) vs 57 patients undergoing primary closure (10 patients [17.5%]) (difference, 2.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -12.4 to 17.3 percentage points). Undergoing elective neck dissection was not associated with a clinically meaningful improvement in overall or disease-free survival compared with observation. Recurrent hypopharynx subsite was associated with an increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 4.28; 95% CI, 1.81 to 10.09) and distant recurrence (hazard ratio, 7.94; 95% CI, 2.07 to 30.48) compared with glottic subsite.
Conclusions And Relevance:
In this cohort study, patients with recurrent supraglottic or advanced T classification tumors had an increased occult nodal positivity rate, elective neck dissection was not associated with survival, and patients with recurrent hypopharynx subsite were more likely to have a distant recurrence and die of their disease. These findings suggest that underlying disease pathology rather than surgical management may be associated with survival outcomes in this population.
