Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2025
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
Sustained Low Relapse Rate With Highly Variable B-Cell Repopulation Dynamics With Extended Rituximab Dosing Intervals
Chiara Starvaggi Cucuzza1, Elisa Longinetti1, Nicolas Ruffin1
1From the Department of Clinical Neuroscience (C.S.C., E.L., N.R., B.E., I.K., M.J., F.A.N., F.P.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Center for Molecular Medicine (C.S.C., N.R., I.K., M.J., F.A.N., F.P.), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurology (B.E., F.P.), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Center for Neurology (C.S.C., I.K., M.J., F.A.N., F.P.), Academic Specialist Center, Stockholm, Sweden; and Clinical Epidemiology Division (T.F.), Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Background And Objectives:
B cell-depleting therapies are highly effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) but are associated with increased infection risk and blunted humoral vaccination responses. Extension of dosing intervals may mitigate such negative effects, but its consequences on MS disease activity are yet to be ascertained. The objective of this study was to determine clinical and neuroradiologic disease activity, as well as B-cell repopulation dynamics, after implementation of extended rituximab dosing in RRMS.
Methods:
We conducted a prospective observational study in a specialized-care, single-center setting, including patients with RRMS participating in the COMBAT-MS and MultipleMS observational drug trials, who had received at least 2 courses of rituximab (median follow-up 4.2 years, range 0.1-8.9 years). Using Cox regression, hazard ratios (HRs) of clinical relapse and/or contrast-enhancing lesions on MRI were calculated in relation to time since last dose of rituximab.
Results:
A total of 3,904 dose intervals were accumulated in 718 patients and stratified into 4 intervals: <8, ≥8 to 12, ≥12 to 18, and ≥18 months. We identified 24 relapses of which 20 occurred within 8 months since previous infusion and 4 with intervals over 8 months. HRs for relapse when comparing ≥8 to 12, ≥12 to 18, and ≥18 months with <8 months since last dose were 0.28 (95% CI 0.04-2.10), 0.38 (95% CI 0.05-2.94), and 0.89 (95% CI 0.20-4.04), respectively, and thus nonsignificant. Neuroradiologic outcomes mirrored relapse rates. Dynamics of total B-cell reconstitution varied considerably, but median total B-cell counts reached lower level of normal after 12 months and median memory B-cell counts after 16 months.
Discussion:
In this prospective cohort of rituximab-treated patients with RRMS exposed to extended dosing intervals, we could not detect a relation between clinical or neuroradiologic disease activity and time since last infusion. Total B- and memory B-cell repopulation kinetics varied considerably. These findings, relevant for assessing risk-mitigation strategies with anti-CD20 therapies in RRMS, suggest that relapse risk remains low with extended infusion intervals. Further studies are needed to investigate the relation between B-cell repopulation dynamics and adverse event risks associated with B-cell depletion.
More Related Videos
09:41Imaging CD19+ B Cells in an Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Mouse Model using Positron Emission Tomography
Published on: January 20, 2023
08:22Retroviral Overexpression of CXCR4 on Murine B-1a Cells and Adoptive Transfer for Targeted B-1a Cell Migration to the Bone Marrow and IgM Production
Published on: May 31, 2020
