Structural basis for the severe adverse interaction of sofosbuvir and amiodarone on L-type Cav channels

Xia Yao1, Shuai Gao1, Jixin Wang2

  • 1Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.

Cell
|November 23, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Fatal drug interactions between antiviral sofosbuvir and antiarrhythmic amiodarone were investigated. Sofosbuvir binds within the amiodarone-occupied calcium channel, blocking ion flow and causing dangerous heart rhythm effects.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Pharmacology and Structural Biology
  • Biophysical investigation of the sofosbuvir amiodarone interaction in cardiac ion channels
  • Cryogenic electron microscopy of voltage-gated calcium channel complexes

Background:

Prior research has shown that the combination of the hepatitis C antiviral sofosbuvir and the antiarrhythmic agent amiodarone results in life-threatening symptomatic bradycardia. It was already known that amiodarone acts as a non-selective antagonist across multiple cardiac ion channels to manage rhythm disorders. Clinical reports noted that sofosbuvir or its chemical analog MNI-1 significantly enhances the suppression of calcium signaling within cardiomyocytes when amiodarone is present. This synergistic effect specifically targets L-type Voltage-Gated Calcium (Cav) channels, which are essential for maintaining the plateau phase of the cardiac action potential. Despite these clinical observations, the precise spatial arrangement and binding kinetics of these molecules within the channel pore remained elusive. The medical community lacked a clear understanding of whether these drugs competed for the same site or functioned through independent mechanisms. This absence of evidence motivated the current investigation into the atomic-scale architecture of the drug-channel complex to prevent future clinical fatalities.

Purpose Of The Study:

This investigation seeks to elucidate the structural determinants underlying the lethal pharmacodynamic synergy between sofosbuvir and amiodarone. Researchers aimed to determine whether sofosbuvir possesses an intrinsic affinity for the pore-forming subunits of L-type Calcium (Cav) channels. The study evaluates how the presence of amiodarone alters the binding landscape for sofosbuvir or its structural derivative MNI-1. Scientists focused on identifying the specific amino acid residues and drug-drug contact points that stabilize the inhibitory complex within the protein scaffold. Mapping the physical obstruction of the ion permeation pathway provides a mechanistic explanation for reduced calcium conductance and subsequent cardiac slowing. The team intended to resolve the specific binding sites for each molecule to understand the cooperative nature of their inhibitory action. Establishing this molecular framework helps clarify why this specific drug combination triggers severe adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing treatment for hepatitis C.

Main Methods:

The experimental team employed high-resolution Cryogenic Electron Microscopy (cryo-EM) to visualize the skeletal muscle Cav1.1 and cardiac Cav1.3 isoforms. Purified channel proteins underwent treatment with amiodarone or sofosbuvir in isolation to define baseline binding characteristics for each individual compound. Subsequent trials necessitated the simultaneous application of amiodarone alongside either sofosbuvir or the analog MNI-1 to capture the ternary complex in a stable state. Data acquisition leveraged advanced electron detection systems to resolve the density maps of the transmembrane pore domains at near-atomic resolution. Computational modeling and structural refinement permitted the precise placement of drug molecules within the observed electron densities of the channel subunits. Systematic comparison of the apo-state and drug-bound structures displayed conformational changes induced by the ligands within the pore and voltage-sensing domains. The researchers applied these structural maps to ascertain the proximity between the drugs and the surrounding amino acid side chains within the pore.

Main Results:

Structural data demonstrated that amiodarone independently occupies the classical dihydropyridine binding pocket located within the channel's voltage-sensing domain. Sofosbuvir failed to show any detectable binding or density within the Cav channel architecture when administered without the presence of amiodarone. The presence of amiodarone creates a unique docking site that enables sofosbuvir or MNI-1 to anchor firmly within the central cavity of the pore. This ternary arrangement comprises direct physical interactions between the two drug molecules, effectively wedging the antiviral into the ion conduction pathway. The resulting molecular assembly physically occludes the ion conduction path, preventing the movement of calcium ions through the membrane during depolarization. These findings confirm that amiodarone acts as a necessary scaffold for sofosbuvir-mediated channel blockade, explaining the observed clinical toxicity. The study concluded that the interaction is highly specific to the chemical structure of these two therapeutic agents and their spatial orientation within the protein scaffold.

Conclusions:

The study establishes a definitive structural model for the dangerous pharmacodynamic interaction between these two distinct therapeutic classes. These results clarify the molecular etiology of fatal heartbeat slowing observed in patients receiving concurrent hepatitis C and arrhythmia treatments. Recognizing the central cavity as the site of drug-drug stabilization offers a new perspective on multi-drug toxicity mechanisms in cardiac tissue. Future pharmacological screening for antiviral candidates should consider potential scaffold-mediated interactions with existing cardiac medications to avert similar adverse events. This structural insight provides a basis for designing safer nucleotide analogs that lack the specific moieties required for amiodarone-dependent binding. The research highlights the necessity of structural biology in predicting and preventing severe adverse drug reactions in clinical settings. By understanding the physical basis of this interaction, clinicians can better manage the risks associated with polypharmacy in complex patient populations and improve overall patient safety.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Concept Videos

Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers01:22

Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers

Class I antiarrhythmic drugs are used to treat various types of arrhythmias or irregular heart rhythms. These drugs block the sodium (Na+) channels in the cardiac cells, thereby affecting the movement of electrical impulses across the heart. Class I antiarrhythmic drugs are divided into three subgroups: Class IA, Class IB, and Class IC, each with distinct mechanisms of action and effects on the heart.
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
1.6K
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers01:12

Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers

Class III antiarrhythmic drugs are a group of medications that can prolong action potentials in the heart. They achieve this by blocking potassium channels or enhancing inward currents from sodium channels. However, these drugs have a unique property of "reverse use-dependence," which is most pronounced at slower heart rates and can lead to torsades de pointes—a specific type of arrhythmia. However, it is essential to note that excessive QT interval prolongation—a measure of...
1.1K
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers01:20

Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers

Class IV antiarrhythmic drugs, such as verapamil and diltiazem, block calcium channels. They primarily affect the heart, slowing the conduction in calcium-dependent tissues like the SA and AV nodes. These drugs manage reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and reduce ventricular rate in atrial flutter/fibrillation.
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
938
Antiepileptic Drugs: Potassium Channel Activators01:20

Antiepileptic Drugs: Potassium Channel Activators

Ezocgabine or retigabine, an antiepileptic drug of remarkable efficacy, has revolutionized the management of seizures. It is a potassium channel activator, explicitly targeting the family of Q subtype potassium channels. It enhances the transmembrane potassium currents, regulating neuronal excitability. This action stabilizes the resting membrane potential, a pivotal factor in mitigating the hyperexcitability that characterizes epilepsy.
Ezogabine has gained approval as an adjunctive treatment...
243
Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action01:28

Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action

Depolarizing blockers act on skeletal muscle fibers' membranes and induce their depolarization. Most depolarizing blockers have two quaternary N+ atoms that bind the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and cause neuromuscular blockade within minutes.
Succinylcholine is the most commonly used depolarizing blocker. Chemically, it constitutes two molecules of acetylcholine joined together by an acetate methyl group. They act on the receptors in the same way as acetylcholine. Because...
1.7K
Antiepileptic Drugs: Sodium Channel Blockers01:08

Antiepileptic Drugs: Sodium Channel Blockers

Antiepileptic drugs are specialized medications that prevent seizures in individuals diagnosed with epilepsy. These drugs primarily function by blocking the movement of sodium ions through channels in the neuronal membrane, inhibiting the repetitive firing of action potentials often associated with seizures.
Sodium channel blockers modulate ion channels, particularly voltage-gated sodium channels. They block only sodium ion movement.
Among the most commonly prescribed antiepileptic drugs are...
795