Structural basis for the severe adverse interaction of sofosbuvir and amiodarone on L-type Cav channels
Xia Yao1, Shuai Gao1, Jixin Wang2
1Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Abstract:
Drug-drug interaction of the antiviral sofosbuvir and the antiarrhythmics amiodarone has been reported to cause fatal heartbeat slowing. Sofosbuvir and its analog, MNI-1, were reported to potentiate the inhibition of cardiomyocyte calcium handling by amiodarone, which functions as a multi-channel antagonist, and implicate its inhibitory effect on L-type Cav channels, but the molecular mechanism has remained unclear. Here we present systematic cryo-EM structural analysis of Cav1.1 and Cav1.3 treated with amiodarone or sofosbuvir alone, or sofosbuvir/MNI-1 combined with amiodarone. Whereas amiodarone alone occupies the dihydropyridine binding site, sofosbuvir is not found in the channel when applied on its own. In the presence of amiodarone, sofosbuvir/MNI-1 is anchored in the central cavity of the pore domain through specific interaction with amiodarone and directly obstructs the ion permeation path. Our study reveals the molecular basis for the physical, pharmacodynamic interaction of two drugs on the scaffold of Cav channels.
Insights
Fatal drug interactions between antiviral sofosbuvir and antiarrhythmic amiodarone were investigated. Sofosbuvir binds within the amiodarone-occupied calcium channel, blocking ion flow and causing dangerous heart rhythm effects.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Pharmacology and Structural Biology
- Biophysical investigation of the sofosbuvir amiodarone interaction in cardiac ion channels
- Cryogenic electron microscopy of voltage-gated calcium channel complexes
Background:
Prior research has shown that the combination of the hepatitis C antiviral sofosbuvir and the antiarrhythmic agent amiodarone results in life-threatening symptomatic bradycardia. It was already known that amiodarone acts as a non-selective antagonist across multiple cardiac ion channels to manage rhythm disorders. Clinical reports noted that sofosbuvir or its chemical analog MNI-1 significantly enhances the suppression of calcium signaling within cardiomyocytes when amiodarone is present. This synergistic effect specifically targets L-type Voltage-Gated Calcium (Cav) channels, which are essential for maintaining the plateau phase of the cardiac action potential. Despite these clinical observations, the precise spatial arrangement and binding kinetics of these molecules within the channel pore remained elusive. The medical community lacked a clear understanding of whether these drugs competed for the same site or functioned through independent mechanisms. This absence of evidence motivated the current investigation into the atomic-scale architecture of the drug-channel complex to prevent future clinical fatalities.
Purpose Of The Study:
This investigation seeks to elucidate the structural determinants underlying the lethal pharmacodynamic synergy between sofosbuvir and amiodarone. Researchers aimed to determine whether sofosbuvir possesses an intrinsic affinity for the pore-forming subunits of L-type Calcium (Cav) channels. The study evaluates how the presence of amiodarone alters the binding landscape for sofosbuvir or its structural derivative MNI-1. Scientists focused on identifying the specific amino acid residues and drug-drug contact points that stabilize the inhibitory complex within the protein scaffold. Mapping the physical obstruction of the ion permeation pathway provides a mechanistic explanation for reduced calcium conductance and subsequent cardiac slowing. The team intended to resolve the specific binding sites for each molecule to understand the cooperative nature of their inhibitory action. Establishing this molecular framework helps clarify why this specific drug combination triggers severe adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing treatment for hepatitis C.
Main Methods:
The experimental team employed high-resolution Cryogenic Electron Microscopy (cryo-EM) to visualize the skeletal muscle Cav1.1 and cardiac Cav1.3 isoforms. Purified channel proteins underwent treatment with amiodarone or sofosbuvir in isolation to define baseline binding characteristics for each individual compound. Subsequent trials necessitated the simultaneous application of amiodarone alongside either sofosbuvir or the analog MNI-1 to capture the ternary complex in a stable state. Data acquisition leveraged advanced electron detection systems to resolve the density maps of the transmembrane pore domains at near-atomic resolution. Computational modeling and structural refinement permitted the precise placement of drug molecules within the observed electron densities of the channel subunits. Systematic comparison of the apo-state and drug-bound structures displayed conformational changes induced by the ligands within the pore and voltage-sensing domains. The researchers applied these structural maps to ascertain the proximity between the drugs and the surrounding amino acid side chains within the pore.
Main Results:
Structural data demonstrated that amiodarone independently occupies the classical dihydropyridine binding pocket located within the channel's voltage-sensing domain. Sofosbuvir failed to show any detectable binding or density within the Cav channel architecture when administered without the presence of amiodarone. The presence of amiodarone creates a unique docking site that enables sofosbuvir or MNI-1 to anchor firmly within the central cavity of the pore. This ternary arrangement comprises direct physical interactions between the two drug molecules, effectively wedging the antiviral into the ion conduction pathway. The resulting molecular assembly physically occludes the ion conduction path, preventing the movement of calcium ions through the membrane during depolarization. These findings confirm that amiodarone acts as a necessary scaffold for sofosbuvir-mediated channel blockade, explaining the observed clinical toxicity. The study concluded that the interaction is highly specific to the chemical structure of these two therapeutic agents and their spatial orientation within the protein scaffold.
Conclusions:
The study establishes a definitive structural model for the dangerous pharmacodynamic interaction between these two distinct therapeutic classes. These results clarify the molecular etiology of fatal heartbeat slowing observed in patients receiving concurrent hepatitis C and arrhythmia treatments. Recognizing the central cavity as the site of drug-drug stabilization offers a new perspective on multi-drug toxicity mechanisms in cardiac tissue. Future pharmacological screening for antiviral candidates should consider potential scaffold-mediated interactions with existing cardiac medications to avert similar adverse events. This structural insight provides a basis for designing safer nucleotide analogs that lack the specific moieties required for amiodarone-dependent binding. The research highlights the necessity of structural biology in predicting and preventing severe adverse drug reactions in clinical settings. By understanding the physical basis of this interaction, clinicians can better manage the risks associated with polypharmacy in complex patient populations and improve overall patient safety.
Frequently Asked Questions
Based on this study's findings, amiodarone acts as a scaffold that anchors sofosbuvir within the central cavity of L-type Ca<sub>v</sub> channels. This physical assembly obstructs the ion permeation path, reducing calcium conductance and causing fatal bradycardia.
The cryo-EM structural analysis revealed that sofosbuvir shows no density in Ca<sub>v</sub>1.1 or Ca<sub>v</sub>1.3 alone. However, when amiodarone occupies the dihydropyridine site, it creates a specific docking environment that stabilizes sofosbuvir in the pore.
The researchers used cryo-EM to resolve the near-atomic density maps of the transmembrane pore domains. This enabled the precise identification of the drug-drug contact points and the physical occlusion of the ion conduction path.
No, the study's authors found that sofosbuvir is not found in the channel when applied on its own. The inhibitory effect on ion permeation is confined to conditions where amiodarone is already bound to the protein.
The study's authors propose that future pharmacological screening should evaluate potential scaffold-mediated interactions. This structural basis allows for the design of safer nucleotide analogs that lack the specific moieties required for amiodarone-dependent channel blockade.
More Related Videos
10:41Laser-Induced Action Potential-Like Measurements of Cardiomyocytes on Microelectrode Arrays for Increased Predictivity of Safety Pharmacology
Published on: September 13, 2022
10:53Isolation of Human Atrial Myocytes for Simultaneous Measurements of Ca2+ Transients and Membrane Currents
Published on: July 3, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Antiepileptic Drugs: Potassium Channel Activators
Ezogabine has gained approval as an adjunctive treatment...
Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Succinylcholine is the most commonly used depolarizing blocker. Chemically, it constitutes two molecules of acetylcholine joined together by an acetate methyl group. They act on the receptors in the same way as acetylcholine. Because...
Antiepileptic Drugs: Sodium Channel Blockers
Sodium channel blockers modulate ion channels, particularly voltage-gated sodium channels. They block only sodium ion movement.
Among the most commonly prescribed antiepileptic drugs are...
