Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2025

09:32
Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
Published on: April 11, 2018
9.8K
A Density-Dependent Target Stimulus for Inverse Bone (Re)modeling with Homogenized Finite Element Models
Sebastian Bachmann1, Dieter H Pahr2,3, Alexander Synek2
1Institute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, TU Wien, Gumpendorfer Straße 7, 1060, Vienna, Austria. bachmann@ilsb.tuwien.ac.at.
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
|November 23, 2022
Summary
Homogenized finite element (hFE) models can predict bone loading conditions faster than micro-FE models. While accurate, hFE-based inverse bone remodeling (IBR) shows some magnitude errors compared to micro-FE IBR.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Computational modeling
- Bone physiology
Background:
- Inverse bone remodeling (IBR) infers physiological loads from bone microstructure.
- Micro-FE (µFE) analysis is computationally intensive for IBR.
- Homogenized FE (hFE) models offer a computationally efficient alternative.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of hFE models for IBR.
- To introduce a new continuum-level target stimulus for hFE-based IBR.
- To compare hFE-based IBR predictions with µFE-based IBR.
Main Methods:
- Developed a new continuum-level target stimulus.
- Applied hFE models to 21 distal radii sections.
- Compared hFE-based IBR predictions to µFE-based IBR.
Main Results:
- hFE models correctly identified dominant load direction.
- High correlation observed between predicted and actual forces.
- Mean magnitude errors ranged from -14.7% to 26.6%.
Conclusions:
- hFE-based IBR provides faster predictions than µFE-based IBR.
- hFE models enable more sophisticated boundary conditions and use of clinical images.
- µFE-based IBR remains the gold standard, but hFE-based IBR shows promise.
Related Concept Videos
Bone Remodeling
38.4K
Bone remodeling is a continuous and balanced process of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts. In adults, it helps maintain bone mass and calcium homeostasis. While mechanical stress can stimulate turnover as part of the normal maintenance and reparative process, several hormones also regulate bone remodeling.
38.4K
Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling
3.1K
Osteoclasts are cells responsible for bone resorption and remodeling. They originate from hematopoietic progenitor cells present in the bone marrow. Numerous progenitor cells fuse to form multinucleated cells, each with 10-20 nuclei. A single osteoclast has a diameter of 150 to 200 µM. These cells have ruffled borders that break down the underlying bone tissue and release minerals such as calcium into the blood in bone resorption. Osteoclasts cling to bones with their ruffled edges during...
3.1K
The Bone Matrix
4.1K
Bone contains a relatively small number of cells entrenched in a matrix of collagen fibers that provide an adherent surface for inorganic salt crystals. Both components of the matrix, organic and inorganic, contribute to the unusual properties of bone. Without collagen, bones would be brittle and shatter easily. Without mineral crystals, bones would flex and provide little support. This can be observed by an experiment: when the minerals of a bone are dissolved by soaking the bone in...
4.1K
Bone Disorders
3.8K
Aging and its effect on bone remodeling is the most common cause of bone disorders. In young and healthy people, bone deposition and resorption happen at an equal rate to maintain optimal bone health.
Bone deposition is also affected by the levels of sex hormones like estrogen and testosterone that promote osteoblast activity and bone matrix synthesis. When the level of these hormones decreases due to aging, it causes a reduction in bone deposition. As a result, bone resorption by osteoclasts...
Bone deposition is also affected by the levels of sex hormones like estrogen and testosterone that promote osteoblast activity and bone matrix synthesis. When the level of these hormones decreases due to aging, it causes a reduction in bone deposition. As a result, bone resorption by osteoclasts...
3.8K

