Exploring chemical space in non-targeted analysis: a proposed ChemSpace tool
Gabrielle Black1, Charles Lowe2, Tarun Anumol3
1Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA. gnpecora@ucdavis.edu.
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
|November 26, 2022
Summary
Non-targeted analysis (NTA) using high-resolution mass spectrometry can be limited by workflow constraints. This study proposes a chemical space mapping tool to assess compound detectability and improve NTA reproducibility.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Chemistry
- Analytical Chemistry
- Toxicology
Background:
- Non-targeted analysis (NTA) with high-resolution mass spectrometry enables broad compound detection for exposure monitoring and toxicology.
- NTA workflows define a 'chemical space' of detectable compounds, but understanding workflow limitations remains challenging.
- Assessing non-detection as true absence versus workflow-induced false negatives is difficult due to non-standardized methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the need for accessible chemical space mapping in NTA studies.
- To propose a tool for predicting compound detectability within NTA workflows.
- To enhance transparency and standardization in NTA by quantifying workflow constraints.
Main Methods:
- Combining existing predictive and analytical tools to generate compound detectability scores.
- Developing a hypothetical 'ChemSpaceTool' to map chemical space coverage of NTA workflows.
- Utilizing sample extraction, data acquisition, and data analysis parameters to define workflow chemical space.
Main Results:
- The proposed tool generates scores indicating the likelihood of a compound being detected and identified.
- Higher scores suggest greater detectability, while lower scores indicate a higher probability of false negatives.
- The tool can be used prospectively for library curation and retrospectively for filtering false detections.
Conclusions:
- Chemical space mapping improves NTA transparency and communication of false detection rates.
- Standardizing NTA through better understanding of workflow limitations enhances method comparison and reproducibility.
- The development of such a tool is crucial for broader NTA applications beyond research settings.


