Do individual differences in lexical reliance reflect states or traits?

Research suggests that individuals differ in the degree to which they rely on lexical information to support speech perception. However, the locus of these differences is not yet known; nor is it known whether these individual differences reflect a context-dependent "state" or a stable listener "trait." Here we test the hypothesis that individual differences in lexical reliance are a stable trait that is linked to individuals' relative weighting of lexical and acoustic-phonetic information for speech perception. At each of two sessions, listeners (n = 73) completed a Ganong task, a phonemic restoration task, and a locally time-reversed speech task - three tasks that have been used to demonstrate a lexical influence on speech perception. Robust lexical effects on speech perception were observed for each task in the aggregate. Individual differences in lexical reliance were stable across sessions; however, relationships among the three tasks in each session were weak. For the Ganong and locally time-reversed speech tasks, increased reliance on lexical information was associated with weaker reliance on acoustic-phonetic information. Collectively, these results (1) provide some evidence to suggest that individual differences in lexical reliance for a given task are a stable reflection of the relative weighting of acoustic-phonetic and lexical cues for speech perception in that task, and (2) highlight the need for a better understanding of the psychometric characteristics of tasks used in the psycholinguistic domain to build theories that can accommodate individual differences in mapping speech to meaning.