Transvaginal Mesh-related Complications and the Potential Role of Bacterial Colonization: An Exploratory

Chantal M Diedrich1, Kim W J Verhorstert1, Martijn Riool2

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9 (Drs. Diedrich, Verhorstert, Schuster, and Roovers), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9 (Drs. Diedrich, Verhorstert, Riool, Zaa, and Schuster, Ms. de Boer), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Insights

Bacterial colonization of transvaginal mesh may cause mesh-related complications (MRCs). This study found higher bacterial diversity and counts in patients with MRCs compared to a reference group, suggesting a role for biofilms.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecology
  • Microbiology
  • Pathology

Background:

  • Transvaginal mesh is used for pelvic organ prolapse repair.
  • Mesh-related complications (MRCs) are a significant concern.
  • The role of bacterial colonization in MRC development is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the presence and characteristics of bacterial colonization on transvaginal mesh.
  • To determine if bacterial colonization differs between patients with and without MRCs.
  • To explore the association between bacterial load, species, and MRCs.

Main Methods:

  • Observational study involving 49 patients undergoing mesh removal and 20 controls.
  • Collection of mesh-tissue complexes and vaginal tissue samples.
  • Quantitative microbiological cultures, histological scoring for inflammation/fibrosis, Gram staining, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for bacteria and biofilms.

Main Results:

  • 90% of mesh samples showed bacterial growth, with higher diversity and Gram-negative bacteria in the MRC group.
  • Common bacteria included staphylococci, streptococci, Actinomyces spp., Cutibacterium acnes, and Escherichia coli.
  • Histology revealed inflammation, and FISH confirmed polymicrobial biofilms at the mesh-tissue interface.

Conclusions:

  • Distinct differences in bacterial presence and species exist between patients with MRCs and controls.
  • Bacteria are present at the mesh-tissue interface, often within biofilms.
  • These findings support the hypothesis that bacterial mesh colonization contributes to the development of MRCs.