Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025

Differential Effects of Lipid-lowering Drugs in Modulating Morphology of Cholesterol Particles
Published on: November 10, 2017
Lost Therapeutic Benefit of Delayed Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Control in Statin-Treated Patients and
Clara Marquina1, Jedidiah Morton2, Ella Zomer3
1Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Insights
Delaying lipid-lowering treatment intensification in patients with high cholesterol leads to more coronary heart disease events and wasted healthcare resources. Promptly achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals is crucial for better patient outcomes and economic efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Economics
- Pharmacoeconomics
Background:
- Suboptimal attainment of therapeutic low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals is common in patients receiving statin therapy.
- The health economic impact of delayed lipid-lowering treatment intensification in Australia is not fully quantified.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the health economic impact of delayed lipid-lowering intensification in statin-treated patients with uncontrolled LDL-C from an Australian perspective.
- To compare the outcomes of no delay versus a 5-year delay in achieving LDL-C goals.
Main Methods:
- A lifetime Markov cohort model (n=1000) was developed to estimate the impact on coronary heart disease (CHD) of intensifying lipid-lowering treatment.
- Intensification strategies included high-intensity statins or statins + ezetimibe, compared with standard of care (no intensification).
- Outcomes included CHD events, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), healthcare and productivity costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).
Main Results:
- Compared to standard care, no delay in treatment intensification with high-intensity statins prevented 29 CHD events and gained 30 QALYs (ICER AU$13,205/QALY).
- A 5-year delay with high-intensity statins prevented 22 CHD events and gained 16 QALYs (ICER AU$20,270/QALY).
- No delay with statins + ezetimibe prevented 53 CHD events and gained 45 QALYs (ICER AU$37,271/QALY), versus 40 CHD events and 29 QALYs (ICER AU$44,218/QALY) with a 5-year delay.
Conclusions:
- Delaying the attainment of LDL-C goals results in significant loss of therapeutic benefit.
- Delayed intensification leads to a waste of healthcare resources and reduced patient quality-adjusted life-years.
- Urgent policy interventions are necessary to improve LDL-C goal attainment in statin-treated patients.
Objectives:
Attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) therapeutic goals in statin-treated patients remains suboptimal. We quantified the health economic impact of delayed lipid-lowering intensification from an Australian healthcare and societal perspective.
Methods:
A lifetime Markov cohort model (n = 1000) estimating the impact on coronary heart disease (CHD) of intensifying lipid-lowering treatment in statin-treated patients with uncontrolled LDL-C, at moderate to high risk of CHD with no delay or after a 5-year delay, compared with standard of care (no intensification), starting at age 40 years. Intensification was tested with high-intensity statins or statins + ezetimibe. LDL-C levels were extracted from a primary care cohort. CHD risk was estimated using the pooled cohort equation. The effect of cumulative exposure to LDL-C on CHD risk was derived from Mendelian randomization data. Outcomes included CHD events, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), healthcare and productivity costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). All outcomes were discounted annually by 5%.
Results:
Over the lifetime horizon, compared with standard of care, achieving LDL-C control with no delay with high-intensity statins prevented 29 CHD events and yielded 30 extra QALYs (ICERs AU$13 205/QALY) versus 22 CHD events and 16 QALYs (ICER AU$20 270/QALY) with a 5-year delay. For statins + ezetimibe, no delay prevented 53 CHD events and gave 45 extra QALYs (ICER AU$37 271/QALY) versus 40 CHD events and 29 QALYs (ICER of AU$44 218/QALY) after a 5-year delay.
Conclusions:
Delaying attainment of LDL-C goals translates into lost therapeutic benefit and a waste of resources. Urgent policies are needed to improve LDL-C goal attainment in statin-treated patients.
Related Concept Videos
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System III: Serum Lipid Profile
Serum lipids are fats and fatty substances in the blood and are crucial for various bodily functions, including energy storage, cellular structure, and hormone production. Serum lipids consist of cholesterol, triglycerides, and phospholipids.
Cholesterol is a soft, fat-like substance found in all body cells. It is crucial for producing hormones, vitamin D, and substances that aid...
Cholesterol: Significance and Regulation
Considering cholesterol and...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

