Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025

14:32
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
23.8K
Prestige Orientation and Reconciliation in the Workplace.
Yohsuke Ohtsubo1, Kazuho Yamaura2
1Department of Social Psychology, Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Summary
Prestige-oriented individuals are more forgiving in workplace conflicts but less likely to apologize when in leadership roles. This research explores social status and workplace reconciliation behaviors.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Organizational Behavior
- Sociology
Background:
- Human social hierarchies are based on dominance and prestige.
- Prestige involves providing valuable information and requires social acceptance.
- Workplace conflicts can arise from interpersonal dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between prestige orientation and conciliatory behaviors in workplace conflicts.
- To examine whether prestige-oriented individuals are more inclined to reconcile with coworkers.
- To differentiate conciliatory behaviors (apologizing vs. forgiving) in relation to prestige and leadership roles.
Main Methods:
- Study 1 surveyed 487 individuals on their conciliatory behaviors in workplace conflicts.
- Study 1 included a subsample analysis of organizational leaders' interactions with followers.
- Study 2 surveyed 678 organizational leaders to confirm findings from Study 1.
Main Results:
- Prestige-oriented individuals reported more apologetic and forgiving behaviors overall.
- Organizational leaders high in prestige orientation were more forgiving but not more apologetic towards subordinates.
- Findings suggest a distinction in conciliatory behaviors based on social status and role.
Conclusions:
- Prestige orientation is linked to increased forgiveness in workplace conflicts, especially for leaders.
- The tendency to apologize in conflicts may differ between general employees and organizational leaders based on prestige.
- Understanding status-based reconciliation strategies can inform conflict resolution in organizations.
Related Concept Videos
In- and Out-Groups
39.3K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.3K
Robbers Cave
14.4K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.4K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
5.3K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.3K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
37.8K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
37.8K
Confirmation Biases
5.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.6K
Social Proof
27.8K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.8K

