Sulfolobus islandicus Employs Orc1-2-Mediated DNA Damage Response in Defense against Infection by SSV2

All living organisms have evolved DNA damage response (DDR) strategies in coping with threats to the integrity of their genome. In response to DNA damage, Sulfolobus islandicus activates its DDR network in which Orc1-2, an ortholog of the archaeal Orc1/Cdc6 superfamily proteins, plays a central regulatory role. Here, we show that pretreatment with UV irradiation reduced virus genome replication in S. islandicus infected with the fusellovirus SSV2. Like treatment with UV or the DNA-damaging agent 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (NQO), infection with SSV2 facilitated the expression of orc1-2 and significantly raised the cellular level of Orc1-2. The inhibitory effect of UV irradiation on the virus DNA level was no longer apparent in the infected culture of an S. islandicus orc1-2 deletion mutant strain. On the other hand, the overexpression of orc1-2 decreased virus genomic DNA by ~10²-fold compared to that in the parent strain. Furthermore, as part of the Orc1-2-mediated DDR response genes for homologous recombination repair (HRR), cell aggregation and intercellular DNA transfer were upregulated, whereas genes for cell division were downregulated. However, the HRR pathway remained functional in host inhibition of SSV2 genome replication in the absence of UpsA, a subunit of pili essential for intercellular DNA transfer. In agreement with this finding, lack of the general transcriptional activator TFB3, which controls the expression of the ups genes, only moderately affected SSV2 genome replication. Our results demonstrate that infection of S. islandicus by SSV2 triggers the host DDR pathway that, in return, suppresses virus genome replication. IMPORTANCE Extremophiles thrive in harsh habitats and thus often face a daunting challenge to the integrity of their genome. How these organisms respond to virus infection when their genome is damaged remains unclear. We found that the thermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus islandicus became more inhibitory to genome replication of the virus SSV2 after preinfection UV irradiation than without the pretreatment. On the other hand, like treatment with UV or other DNA-damaging agents, infection of S. islandicus by SSV2 triggers the activation of Orc1-2-mediated DNA damage response, including the activation of homologous recombination repair, cell aggregation and DNA import, and the repression of cell division. The inhibitory effect of pretreatment with UV irradiation on SSV2 genome replication was no longer observed in an S. islandicus mutant lacking Orc1-2. Our results suggest that DNA damage response is employed by S. islandicus as a strategy to defend against virus infection.