Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exercise Test for Evaluation of the Functional Efficacy of the Pig Cardiovascular System
Published on: May 12, 2023
Functional and Symptomatic Clinical Trial Endpoints: The HFC-ARC Scientific Expert Panel
Mitchell A Psotka1, William T Abraham2, Mona Fiuzat3
1Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA; U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Insights
The Heart Failure Academic Research Consortium (HFC and ARC) explored functional and quality-of-life endpoints for heart failure trials. Standardized patient-reported outcomes and exercise tests are useful, but actigraphy needs further validation for clinical research.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Research Methodology
Background:
- Heart failure clinical research requires efficient and reliable endpoints.
- Existing endpoints for functional status and quality of life need evaluation for clinical trial utility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss and establish consensus on functional and quality-of-life endpoints for heart failure and cardiovascular therapeutics clinical trials.
- To improve the efficiency of clinical research, evidence generation, and patient outcomes in heart failure.
Main Methods:
- Consensus discussions among diverse stakeholders including patients, academic investigators, regulatory bodies (FDA, NIH), payers, and industry.
- Evaluation of the measurement, remote capture, and clinical utility of various endpoints.
Main Results:
- Patient-reported outcomes and exercise tolerance tests (maximal and submaximal) are standardized and validated for clinical trials.
- Actigraphy shows potential but currently lacks consistent validation as a reliable endpoint.
Conclusions:
- Standardized patient-reported outcomes and exercise testing are recommended endpoints for heart failure trials.
- Further research and standardization are needed to establish actigraphy as a consistent clinical trial endpoint.
Abstract:
The Heart Failure Academic Research Consortium is a partnership between the Heart Failure Collaboratory (HFC) and the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) composed of patients, academic investigators from the United States and Europe, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the National Institutes of Health, payers, and industry. Members discussed the measure, remote capture, and clinical utility of functional and quality-of-life endpoints for use in clinical trials of heart failure and cardiovascular therapeutics, with the goal of improving the efficiency of heart failure and cardiovascular clinical research, evidence generation, and thereby patient quality of life, functional status, and survival. Assessments of patient-reported outcomes and maximal and submaximal exercise tolerance are standardized and validated, but actigraphy remains inconsistent as a potential endpoint. This paper details those discussions and consensus recommendations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Preclinical Development: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

