Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
Published on: May 25, 2019
External and middle ear influence on envelope following responses
Sriram Boothalingam1, Vijayalakshmi Easwar1, Abigail Bross1
1Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.
Abstract:
Considerable between-subject variability in envelope following response (EFR) amplitude limits its clinical translation. Based on a pattern of lower amplitude and larger variability in the low (<1.2 kHz) and high (>8 kHz), relative to mid (1-3 kHz) frequency carriers, we hypothesized that the between-subject variability in external and middle ear (EM) contribute to between-subject variability in EFR amplitude. It is predicted that equalizing the stimulus reaching the cochlea by accounting for EM differences using forward pressure level (FPL) calibration would at least partially improve response amplitude and reduce between-subject variability. In 21 young normal hearing adults, EFRs of four modulation rates (91, 96, 101, and 106 Hz) were measured concurrently from four frequency bands [low (0.091-1.2 kHz), mid (1-3 kHz), high (4-5.4 kHz), and very high (vHigh; 8-9.4 kHz)], respectively, with 12 harmonics each. The results indicate that FPL calibration in-ear and in a coupler leads to larger EFR amplitudes in the low and vHigh frequency bands relative to conventional coupler root-mean-square calibration. However, improvement in variability was modest with FPL calibration. This lack of a statistically significant improvement in variability suggests that the dominant source of variability in EFR amplitude may arise from cochlear and/or neural processing.
Related Concept Videos
Anatomy of the Ear
The Cochlea
Hearing
Auditory Perception
Auditory Pathway
When viewed cross-sectionally, the cochlea reveals the scala vestibuli and scala tympani flanking...
Equilibrium and Balance

