Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Egoism and Altruism01:55

Egoism and Altruism

92.1K
Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?
92.1K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

38.9K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.9K
Altruism01:03

Altruism

41.5K
Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
41.5K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.8K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.8K
Routes of Persuasion02:20

Routes of Persuasion

64.4K
Persuasion is the process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication. Much of the persuasion we experience comes from outside forces. How do people convince others to change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? What communications do you receive that attempt to persuade you to change your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors?
64.4K
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development01:19

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

117
Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
117

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Psychopathy and Economic Behavior Among Prison Inmates: An Experiment.

Frontiers in psychology·2021
Same author

No Moral Wiggle Room in an Experimental Corruption Game.

Frontiers in psychology·2021
Same author

Closing the gender gap in competitiveness through priming.

Nature communications·2018
Same author

Altruistic punishment does not increase with the severity of norm violations in the field.

Nature communications·2016
Same author

Revealed distributional preferences: Individuals vs. teams.

Journal of economic behavior & organization·2015
Same author

Direct and indirect punishment among strangers in the field.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 19, 2025

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.2K

Moral suasion and charitable giving.

Loukas Balafoutas1,2,3, Sarah Rezaei4,5

  • 1University of Exeter Business School, Exeter, UK.

Scientific Reports
|December 1, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Moral suasion significantly boosts charitable giving, particularly consequentialist arguments for men. However, women show less response to moral appeals overall, and some ethical arguments prove ineffective.

More Related Videos

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

23.6K
Quantifying Social Motivation in Mice Using Operant Conditioning
07:43

Quantifying Social Motivation in Mice Using Operant Conditioning

Published on: August 8, 2015

18.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 19, 2025

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.2K
Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

23.6K
Quantifying Social Motivation in Mice Using Operant Conditioning
07:43

Quantifying Social Motivation in Mice Using Operant Conditioning

Published on: August 8, 2015

18.3K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Ethics
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Charitable giving is a significant area of study within behavioral economics.
  • Understanding the psychological drivers of altruistic behavior is crucial.
  • Moral persuasion is a potential, yet under-researched, factor influencing donation decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of different moral suasion strategies on charitable donation rates.
  • To examine gender-specific responses to various ethical arguments in the context of giving.
  • To identify which types of moral arguments are effective and which are not.

Main Methods:

  • An online experiment was conducted with participants making allocation choices.
  • Participants received different moral messages before making their decision.
  • The study compared donation rates across various message conditions, including consequentialist, deontological, virtue ethics, ethical egoism, and a simple imperative.

Main Results:

  • Consequentialist and deontological moral arguments significantly increased the donation rate.
  • Men demonstrated a strong positive response to consequentialist arguments.
  • Women were generally less responsive to moral suasion, and virtue ethics, ethical egoism, and donation imperatives showed no significant effect.

Conclusions:

  • Moral suasion, specifically consequentialist and deontological appeals, can effectively enhance charitable giving.
  • Gender differences exist in response to moral persuasion, with men being more receptive to certain arguments.
  • The effectiveness of moral suasion in promoting donations is argument-dependent, with some ethical frameworks proving ineffective.