Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025

Extracting Visual Evoked Potentials from EEG Data Recorded During fMRI-guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: May 12, 2014
Modulation of I-Wave Generating Pathways With Repetitive Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A
Ryoki Sasaki1, Brodie J Hand1, John G Semmler1
1Discipline of Physiology, School of Biomedicine, the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Objectives:
Repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTMS) at indirect (I) wave intervals increases motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) produced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to primary motor cortex (M1). However, the effects of iTMS at early and late intervals on the plasticity of specific I-wave circuits remain unclear. This study therefore aimed to assess how the timing of iTMS influences intracortical excitability within early and late I-wave circuits. To investigate the cortical effects of iTMS more directly, changes due to the intervention were also assessed using combined TMS-electroencephalography (EEG).
Material And Methods:
Eighteen young adults (aged 24.6 ± 4.2 years) participated in four sessions in which iTMS targeting early (1.5-millisecond interval; iTMS1.5) or late (4.0-millisecond interval; iTMS4.0) I-waves was applied over M1. Neuroplasticity was assessed using both posterior-to-anterior (PA) and anterior-to-posterior (AP) stimulus directions to record MEPs and TMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEPs) before and after iTMS. Short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) at interstimulus intervals of 1.5 and 4.0 milliseconds was also used to index I-wave activity.
Results:
MEP amplitude was increased after iTMS (p < 0.01), and this was greater for PA responses (p < 0.01) but not different between iTMS intervals (p = 0.9). Irrespective of iTMS interval and coil current, SICF was facilitated after the intervention (p < 0.01). Although the N45 produced by AP stimulation was decreased by iTMS1.5 (p = 0.04), no other changes in TEP amplitude were observed.
Conclusions:
The timing of iTMS failed to influence which I-wave circuits were potentiated by the intervention. In contrast, decreases in the N45 suggest that the neuroplastic effects of iTMS may include disinhibition of intracortical inhibitory processes.
More Related Videos
08:50Brain State-dependent Brain Stimulation with Real-time Electroencephalography-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: August 20, 2019
07:42Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex
Published on: August 17, 2018