Routine Donor and Recipient Screening for Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma Species in Lung Transplant Recipients

Prakhar Vijayvargiya1,2, Zerelda Esquer Garrigos1,2, Cassie C Kennedy3

  • 1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Abstract

Insights

Routine screening for Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma in lung transplant recipients showed low yield. Donor screening is crucial as most infections are donor-derived, and current preemptive therapies did not significantly reduce post-transplant Mollicute infections.

Area of Science:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Transplantation Medicine
  • Microbiology

Background:

  • Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, and Ureaplasma parvum are potential causes of post-transplant infections in lung transplant recipients.
  • Mollicutes, including these species, can lead to serious complications after lung transplantation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of routine pretransplant screening for Mollicutes in lung transplant recipients.
  • To determine the correlation between pretransplant screening results and the incidence of post-transplant Mollicute infections and hyperammonemia syndrome (HS).

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of lung transplant recipients from 01/01/2015 to 11/15/2019.
  • Pretransplant screening using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for M. hominis and/or Ureaplasma on recipient urine and donor bronchial swabs.
  • Recording of post-transplant Mollicute infections and hyperammonemia syndrome (HS).

Main Results:

  • Of 105 screened patients, 12 (11%) tested positive, primarily from donor samples (10/12).
  • Despite preemptive therapy with antibiotics (doxycycline, levofloxacin, azithromycin), two donor-derived cases of M. hominis mediastinitis and Ureaplasma-associated HS occurred.
  • Patients with positive pretransplant screening were more likely to develop Mollicute infection despite treatment compared to those who screened negative (17% vs 1%).

Conclusions:

  • Pretransplant recipient urine screening has a low yield and is not a reliable predictor of post-transplant Mollicute infection.
  • Most infections are donor-derived, highlighting the importance of donor screening.
  • Routine donor screening and preemptive therapy did not significantly reduce the overall incidence of Mollicute infection or HS in this cohort.