Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2025

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
Trends in the prevalence of intellectual disability among children in Taiwan
I-H Lin1, Y-C Tseng2, D-C Lai1,3
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ditmanson Medical Foundation, Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan.
Background:
Intellectual disability (ID) is a major developmental disability. However, data on changes in the prevalence over time at the national level are limited.
Method:
Using data from the national disability registry, we conducted an ecological study to evaluate the time trends of ID among children in Taiwan. We calculated the prevalence of ID by age, sex and severity, from 2000 to 2011, and assessed the time trends.
Results:
During the study period, the overall prevalence of ID in children aged 3-17 years increased from 3.60 to 5.91 per 1000 (β = 0.22, P < 0.001, r2 = 0.97). The prevalence of mild ID (MID, intelligence quotient: 50-69) increased from 1.30 to 3.60 per 1000 (β = 0.21, P < 0.001, r2 = 0.98). However, the prevalence of severe ID (SID, intelligence quotient: <50) was relatively constant, between 2.22 and 2.38 per 1000 (β = 0.01, P = 0.076, r2 = 0.96). Boys had a higher prevalence than girls, and the average boy-to-girl prevalence ratio was 1.42 for MID and 1.31 for SID. The boy-to-girl prevalence ratios of MID and SID decreased over time (β = -0.01, P < 0.001, r2 = 0.99 for MID; β = -0.01, P < 0.001, r2 = 1.00 for SID).
Conclusion:
The prevalence of ID in Taiwanese children increased from 2000 to 2011 and was largely attributable to increases in MID. Boys had a higher prevalence of ID and were more likely to have MID.
Related Concept Videos
Intellectual Disability
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Biological Influences on Intelligence
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.

