A novel thinking: DDR axis refines the classification of ccRCC with distinctive prognosis, multi omics landscape and

Aimin Jiang1, Jiaao Song1, Xiao Fang2

  • 1Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Navel Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.

Abstract

Insights

DNA damage response (DDR) signatures impact renal cell carcinoma (RCC) development and treatment. A specific subtype (DCS2) shows poor prognosis, highlighting the need for personalized therapies and potential DDX1 targeting.

Area of Science:

  • Genomic stability and cancer biology
  • Oncology and molecular diagnostics
  • Renal cell carcinoma research

Background:

  • DNA damage response (DDR) signatures are crucial for genome stability and cancer progression.
  • The role of DDR signatures in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), particularly clear cell RCC (ccRCC), concerning tumor heterogeneity and microenvironment is not well understood.
  • Understanding DDR's impact is vital for advancing cancer treatment strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the association between DDR-related gene expression and distinct subgroups within renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
  • To characterize the clinical, molecular, and prognostic differences between identified RCC subgroups based on DDR signatures.
  • To explore therapeutic sensitivities and identify potential biomarkers for improved RCC diagnosis and treatment.

Main Methods:

  • Employed unsupervised clustering to classify RCC patients into two subgroups (DCS1 and DCS2) based on DDR gene expression.
  • Conducted multi-dimensional comparative analysis of clinical stage, grade, prognosis, metabolic status, immune microenvironment, and mutation rates between the subgroups.
  • Developed and validated a prognostic system utilizing subtype-specific biomarkers.

Main Results:

  • RCC subgroup DCS2 exhibited significantly higher clinical stage/grade and poorer prognosis compared to DCS1, potentially linked to active metabolism and immunosuppression.
  • A high mutation rate in the DCS2 subgroup was identified as a contributing factor to its worse prognosis.
  • Differential sensitivity to therapeutic agents was observed between subgroups, and DDX1 was identified as a key DDR gene with potential as a therapeutic target.

Conclusions:

  • DNA damage response (DDR) significantly influences the development and treatment outcomes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
  • The DCS2 subgroup is associated with poor prognosis, necessitating personalized treatment and follow-up strategies.
  • Assessing DDR gene mutations and targeting DDX1 may offer new avenues for clinical decision-making and effective RCC treatment.