Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.1K
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

12.3K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
12.3K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

12.2K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
12.2K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

136
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
136
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.1K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.1K
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

8.3K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
8.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Using Propensity Score Weighting to Enhance the Operating Characteristics of Power Prior in Leveraging External Data to Augment a Traditional Clinical Study.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2025
Same author

A propensity score-integrated approach for leveraging external data in a randomized controlled trial with time-to-event endpoints.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2024
Same author

Propensity score-incorporated adaptive design approaches when incorporating real-world data.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2023
Same author

Principled leveraging of external data in the evaluation of diagnostic devices via the propensity score-integrated composite likelihood approach.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2023
Same author

A Study Design for Augmenting the Control Group in a Randomized Controlled Trial: A Quality Process for Interaction Among Stakeholders.

Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science·2020
Same author

Group sequential comparison of positive predictive value curves for correlated biomarker data.

Statistics in medicine·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 17, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K

Improving precision and power in randomized trials with a two-stage study design: Stratification using clustering

Xuan Ye1, Nelson Lu1, Yunling Xu1

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Pharmaceutical Statistics
|December 12, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel clustering-based stratification method to enhance randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This approach improves statistical power and reduces sample size by adjusting for baseline covariates before outcome data is available.

Keywords:
clusteringcovariate adjustmentpowerprecisionrandomized controlled trial

More Related Videos

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot
07:11

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Published on: January 7, 2019

34.7K
Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

42.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 17, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K
Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot
07:11

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Published on: January 7, 2019

34.7K
Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

42.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Methodology

Background:

  • Adjusting for baseline covariates in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can enhance statistical precision and power.
  • Traditional methods like Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) are commonly used for covariate adjustment.
  • There is a need for alternative methods that are robust and can be implemented early in the trial process.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and describe a novel clustering-based stratification method for adjusting prognostic baseline covariates in RCTs.
  • To demonstrate that this method can be completed prior to outcome data availability.
  • To evaluate the performance of the proposed method through simulations and a practical example.

Main Methods:

  • A stratification method is proposed where clusters (strata) are formed solely based on prognostic baseline covariates.
  • Outcome data and treatment assignment are not used in the cluster formation process.
  • Treatment effects are estimated within each cluster, and an overall treatment effect is calculated by pooling cluster-specific estimates.

Main Results:

  • The clustering-based stratification method allows for adjustment of baseline covariates before outcome data collection.
  • Simulation studies are presented to evaluate the method's performance.
  • An illustrative example is provided to demonstrate the practical application of the proposed method.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed clustering-based stratification method offers a viable alternative for adjusting prognostic baseline covariates in RCTs.
  • This approach can improve the efficiency of clinical trials by potentially reducing sample size requirements.
  • The method's ability to be implemented pre-outcomes makes it a flexible tool in trial design.