Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Multivessel vs. culprit vessel-only percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Jing Wu1, Yonggang Wang2, Chenguang Li3
1Department of Translational Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Insights
Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is declining. While safe for STEMI without cardiogenic shock, it increases mortality for STEMI with cardiogenic shock.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Coronary Syndromes
Background:
- Early revascularization is key for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) mortality reduction.
- The impact of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on STEMI outcomes, especially with cardiogenic shock, requires updated analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate recent trends in multivessel PCI for STEMI patients.
- To evaluate the in-hospital outcomes associated with multivessel PCI in STEMI patients, stratified by the presence or absence of cardiogenic shock.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample database (October 2015-2019).
- Comparison of in-hospital outcomes (mortality, MACCE) between multivessel PCI and culprit-only PCI in STEMI patients.
- Stratification of analysis based on cardiogenic shock presence.
Main Results:
- Multivessel PCI use declined from 20.8% (2015) to 13.9% (2019) for STEMI without cardiogenic shock.
- For STEMI without cardiogenic shock, multivessel PCI showed similar in-hospital mortality (2.4% vs 2.3%) and MACCE (7.4% vs 7.2%) compared to culprit-only PCI.
- For STEMI with cardiogenic shock, multivessel PCI use declined from 29.2% (2015) to 19.4% (2019) and was associated with higher mortality (30.9% vs 28.4%) and MACCE (39.9% vs 36.5%).
Conclusions:
- The utilization of multivessel PCI for STEMI is decreasing.
- Multivessel PCI is linked to poorer in-hospital outcomes in STEMI patients experiencing cardiogenic shock.
- Multivessel PCI does not appear to worsen in-hospital outcomes for STEMI patients without cardiogenic shock.
Background:
Early revascularization of the culprit vessel is the most effective treatment for reducing the risk of mortality from acute STEMI with and without cardiogenic shock. However, the most recent trends and impact of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the index hospitalization on in-hospital outcomes are unknown.
Methods:
The National Inpatient Sample was queried from October 2015 to 2019 for hospitalizations with STEMI. The impact of multivessel PCI on in-hospital outcomes of patients with and without cardiogenic shock was evaluated.
Results:
Of 624,605 STEMI hospitalizations treated with PCI, 12.5% were complicated by cardiogenic shock. Among hospitalizations without cardiogenic shock, 15.7% were treated by multivessel PCI, which declined from 20.8% in 2015 to 13.9% in 2019 (P trend < 0.001). Multivessel and culprit-only PCI had similar rates of In-hospital mortality (2.4 vs. 2.3%, p = 0.027) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; 7.4 vs. 7.2%, p = 0.072). Among hospitalizations with cardiogenic shock, 22.1% were treated by multivessel PCI, which declined from 29.2% in 2015 to 19.4% in 2019 (P trend < 0.001). Multivessel PCI was associated with higher rates of in-hospital mortality (30.9 vs. 28.4%, p < 0.001) and MACCE (39.9 vs. 36.5%, p < 0.001) than culprit-only PCI.
Conclusion:
The frequency of multivessel PCI for STEMI with and without cardiogenic shock is declining. Multivessel PCI is associated with worse in-hospital outcomes for STEMI with cardiogenic shock but not for STEMI without cardiogenic shock.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

