Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2025

08:09
Annotation of Plant Gene Function via Combined Genomics, Metabolomics and Informatics
Published on: June 17, 2012
19.8K
Improving automatic GO annotation with semantic similarity
Bishnu Sarker1,2,3, Navya Khare1,4, Marie-Dominique Devignes1
1CNRS, Inria, LORIA, University of Lorraine, 54000, Nancy, France.
BMC Bioinformatics
|December 12, 2022
Summary
This study introduces GrAPFI-GO, an enhanced method for automatic protein function annotation using Gene Ontology (GO) terms. The approach improves accuracy by leveraging semantic and hierarchical relationships within GO, aiding bioinformatics research.
Area of Science:
- Bioinformatics
- Computational Biology
- Genomics
Background:
- Automatic protein functional annotation is a significant challenge in bioinformatics.
- Manual annotation is time-consuming and resource-intensive.
- There is a need for computational tools to automate protein annotation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To extend the GrAPFI method for automatic protein annotation with Gene Ontology (GO) terms, creating GrAPFI-GO.
- To incorporate semantic similarity and hierarchical relations of GO terms into the annotation process.
- To evaluate the performance of the proposed method.
Main Methods:
- Adapted the graph-based automatic protein function inference (GrAPFI) method.
- Developed GrAPFI-GO for protein annotation using GO terms.
- Explored similarity measures based on common neighbors in protein similarity graphs.
- Implemented a pruning and post-processing technique considering GO term semantic similarity and hierarchy.
Main Results:
- The GrAPFI-GO method was compared with and without common neighbor similarity.
- Performance of GrAPFI-GO and other annotation tools was tested.
- Experimental results demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Conclusions:
- The proposed semantic hierarchical post-processing improves GrAPFI-GO performance.
- The method also enhances the performance of other annotation tools.
- GrAPFI-GO offers an efficient procedure to improve automatic protein function annotation by exploiting GO term semantic relations.
Related Concept Videos
Genome Annotation and Assembly
19.1K
The genome refers to all of the genetic material in an organism. It can range from a few million base pairs in microbial cells to several billion base pairs in many eukaryotic organisms. Genome assembly refers to the process of taking the DNA sequencing data and putting it all back together in a correct order to create a close representation of the original genome. This is followed by the identification of functional elements on the newly assembled genome, a process called genome annotation.
19.1K
Improving Translational Accuracy
2.7K
2.7K
Tagging and Fusion Proteins
6.8K
Proteins are involved in several cellular processes and biochemical reactions. Analyzing a specific protein of interest requires it to be isolated from the other proteins in the cell. This is achieved by overexpressing the specific gene in a suitable host to produce large quantities of the target protein. A tag or label is recombined with the gene to produce a fusion protein containing the target protein and the tag. The tags on these fusion proteins can then be used for easy detection and...
6.8K
RNA-seq
10.3K
RNA sequencing, or RNA-Seq, is a high-throughput sequencing technology used to study the transcriptome of a cell. Transcriptomics helps to interpret the functional elements of a genome and identify the molecular constituents of an organism. Additionally, it also helps in understanding the development of an organism and the occurrence of diseases.
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...
10.3K
Multiple Comparison Tests
4.0K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.0K
Aggregates Classification
362
Aggregate classification is generally based on its size, petrographic characteristics, weight, and source. Size classification ranges from coarse to fine aggregates, defined by the size of the particles. Coarse aggregates are particles that do not pass through ASTM sieve No. 4, and aggregates that pass through the sieve are fine aggregates.
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
362

