Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2025

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
Carnegie and Rockefeller's Philanthropic Legacy: Exclusion of African Americans From Medicine
1L. Morsy is senior lecturer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7131-7473 .
Insights
Philanthropic funding by Carnegie and Rockefeller in the early 20th century excluded African American doctors by closing Black medical schools and promoting industrial education. This historical exclusion contributes to the ongoing underrepresentation of Black physicians in medicine.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education History
- Health Equity Studies
- Sociology of Medicine
Background:
- Early 20th-century philanthropy significantly shaped medical education.
- Historical funding practices by John D. Rockefeller Sr. and Andrew Carnegie influenced access for African Americans.
- The Flexner report and the General Education Board (GEB) played pivotal roles in medical school reforms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine how philanthropic funding mechanisms in the early 20th century excluded African American doctors.
- To analyze the impact of the Flexner report and the GEB's funding on Black medical schools.
- To understand the role of industrial education in underpreparing African American candidates for medical careers.
Main Methods:
- Historical analysis of philanthropic funding patterns.
- Examination of educational policies and their impact on African American students.
- Review of the Flexner report's recommendations and their implementation.
Main Results:
- Carnegie funded the Flexner report, leading to the closure of many Black medical schools.
- Rockefeller's GEB provided disproportionately less funding to Black medical schools compared to White institutions ($1:$123 ratio).
- GEB-supported industrial education curricula underprepared African Americans for medical school entry and success.
Conclusions:
- Philanthropic efforts in the early 1900s actively excluded African Americans from the medical profession.
- These historical mechanisms have had lasting detrimental effects on the representation of African American doctors.
- Addressing current racial disparities in medicine requires understanding this history of exclusion.
Abstract:
In the first 3 decades of the 20th century, John D. Rockefeller Sr. and Andrew Carnegie used their philanthropy to support 2 main mechanisms that functioned to exclude African American doctors from medical education and the medical profession. First, Carnegie funded the Flexner report, recommending reforms to medical education including the closure of most Black medical schools. Next, Rockefeller's General Education Board (GEB) funded restructures to medical education without equal support to ensure Black medical schools could keep up with changing standards. For every dollar the GEB donated to Black medical schools between 1902 and 1919, it donated $123 to White schools. During that period, for every dollar the GEB donated to White medical schools per White resident, it donated about $0.07 to Black schools per African American resident. Next, Rockefeller's philanthropy supported a system of school education that underprepared African American candidates to meet the requirements needed to enter medicine. For African American children, the GEB supported a kind of schooling termed industrial education, which emphasized manual training (e.g., skills related to agricultural science and efficiency). In 1933, industrial education schools were located in 57% of all Southern counties, and two-thirds of African Americans who attended primary and secondary school received an education that followed the industrial education curriculum. Industrial education underprepared candidates for applying to medical school, completing a medical school curriculum, and passing a medical board examination. This article examines how these 2 mechanisms had lasting and harmful effects on the underrepresentation of African American doctors in the medical workforce. These insights provide a broad and collective understanding of the early role of philanthropy in excluding African Americans from the medical profession, which is a crucial first step toward developing interventions to help redress racial discrepancies in the medical profession that persist today.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) and Cancer
RSV is a retrovirus that contains two copies of a plus-strand RNA genome. Its genome consists of four main open...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy...
Standards of Care I

