Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

177
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
177
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.6K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.6K
Pulse Assessment Sites01:11

Pulse Assessment Sites

1.3K
Pulse assessment sites are crucial in evaluating a patient's cardiovascular health. By assessing the pulsations of arteries at specific anatomical locations, healthcare professionals can gather valuable information about blood flow, heart rate, and peripheral circulation. Understanding these pulse assessment sites is essential for conducting comprehensive cardiovascular evaluations and monitoring patients' overall health. These sites are strategically chosen due to the accessibility and...
1.3K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

74.5K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
74.5K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

109
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
109
Standard Deviation of Calculated Results01:14

Standard Deviation of Calculated Results

6.4K
Standard deviation measures the spread of data around the mean value. Many large data sets follow a Gaussian distribution, also known as a normal distribution. This distribution is bell-shaped curved, with the most frequently observed value (mean or central value) in the middle. The farther away from the central value, the greater the deviation from the central value, and the lower the frequency.
A broad Gaussian distribution curve has a wider standard deviation, representing a data set with...
6.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional dyspnea as an early marker of vulnerability to persistent physical symptoms in the CONSTANCES population-based cohort.

Journal of psychosomatic research·2026
Same author

Clinical spectrum, outcome and impact of nephrectomy in critically-ill adult patients with emphysematous pyelonephritis: the PYELEMPHY observational retrospective multicenter Study.

Annals of intensive care·2026
Same author

Electrohypersensitivity beyond controversies.

International journal of hygiene and environmental health·2026
Same author

Effect of dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy transition on body mass index in adolescents living with HIV: secondary analysis of data from the ANRS 12225 Pediacam III cohort in Cameroon.

AIDS research and therapy·2026
Same author

Factors associated with student success in objective structured clinical examinations and written exams.

BMC medical education·2026
Same author

Script concordance tests production optimization using enhanced interactive training: randomized, single-blind, bicentric trial.

BMC medical education·2026
Same journal

Comparing undergraduate learning outcomes and experiences across code-based and non-code-based statistical software platforms in courses utilizing the Passion-Driven Statistics curriculum.

BMC medical education·2026
Same journal

Simulation-based education in undergraduate psychiatry: a focused review and interpretive analysis of clinical competence representation.

BMC medical education·2026
Same journal

The Clinical Mentorship Program: a mixed-methods evaluation of a community-based medical education pathway program for high school students.

BMC medical education·2026
Same journal

Comparison of 3D model-based and slide-based teaching for afferent and efferent spinal cord pathways: a pre-test/post-test study.

BMC medical education·2026
Same journal

Perceptions of medical dramas among medical students in the West Bank, Palestine: a cross-sectional study.

BMC medical education·2026
Same journal

Self-directed learning readiness in preclinical medical education: Patterns, variation, and academic outcomes from a mixed longitudinal and cross-sectional study.

BMC medical education·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 17, 2025

Mixed Reality for Education MRE Implementation and Results in Online Classes for Engineering
04:12

Mixed Reality for Education MRE Implementation and Results in Online Classes for Engineering

Published on: June 23, 2023

711

eOSCE stations live versus remote evaluation and scores variability.

Donia Bouzid1,2, Jimmy Mullaert3, Aiham Ghazali3

  • 1Université Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm IAME, F-75018, Paris, France. donia.bouzid@aphp.fr.

BMC Medical Education
|December 13, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Remote evaluation in online Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) is as reliable as live assessment. This study compared remote versus live evaluations, finding no significant score differences, supporting the validity of online OSCEs.

Keywords:
Global ratingsInterrater reliabilityRemote objective structured clinical examination

More Related Videos

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

10.3K
Evaluation of Commercial-Off-The-Shelf Wrist Wearables to Estimate Stress on Students
12:51

Evaluation of Commercial-Off-The-Shelf Wrist Wearables to Estimate Stress on Students

Published on: June 16, 2018

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 17, 2025

Mixed Reality for Education MRE Implementation and Results in Online Classes for Engineering
04:12

Mixed Reality for Education MRE Implementation and Results in Online Classes for Engineering

Published on: June 23, 2023

711
Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

10.3K
Evaluation of Commercial-Off-The-Shelf Wrist Wearables to Estimate Stress on Students
12:51

Evaluation of Commercial-Off-The-Shelf Wrist Wearables to Estimate Stress on Students

Published on: June 16, 2018

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Clinical Assessment
  • Digital Health

Background:

  • Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are a recognized fair evaluation method.
  • The adoption of online OSCEs (eOSCEs) has increased significantly in recent years.
  • Concerns exist regarding the reliability of remote versus live evaluations in eOSCEs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the reliability of remote versus live evaluations in the context of eOSCEs.
  • To identify factors contributing to score variability in eOSCEs.
  • To assess inter-rater reliability in a large-scale eOSCE setting.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted large-scale eOSCEs at Université de Paris Cité in June 2021.
  • Recorded student performances for dual evaluation (remote vs. live).
  • Utilized a linear mixed model with student and rater as random effects to analyze score agreement.

Main Results:

  • Analyzed 170, 192, and 110 observations across three stations.
  • Rater variance explained 16.8% to 32.8% of score variance.
  • No systematic differences were found between remote and live evaluations (p > 0.05 for two stations).

Conclusions:

  • Remote evaluation demonstrates comparable reliability to live evaluation for eOSCEs.
  • The findings support the use of eOSCEs as a valid assessment tool.
  • Further research can explore other factors influencing score variability in digital clinical examinations.