Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

2D NMR: Overview of Homonuclear Correlation Techniques01:16

2D NMR: Overview of Homonuclear Correlation Techniques

266
Homonuclear correlation spectroscopy (COSY) is a powerful technique used in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to study the correlations between nuclei of the same type within a molecule. It provides information about scalar couplings between adjacent nuclei, which helps determine connectivity and structural information. There are several COSY variants, each with its unique strengths and experimental parameters.
COSY90 is the standard two-dimensional (2D) COSY experiment that...
266
2D NMR: Overview of Heteronuclear Correlation Techniques01:18

2D NMR: Overview of Heteronuclear Correlation Techniques

268
Heteronuclear correlation spectroscopy is an analytical technique that investigates the coupling between different types of nuclei, often a proton and an X-nucleus, such as carbon-13 or nitrogen-15. This method is commonly used in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to gain insights into complex chemical compounds' structural and compositional aspects. A typical heteronuclear correlation spectrum displays X-nucleus chemical shifts on one axis and a proton spectrum on the other...
268
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

2.7K
2.7K
Correlation of Experimental Data01:23

Correlation of Experimental Data

262
Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
262

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Partner change, birth interval and risk of pre-eclampsia: a paradoxical triangle.

Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology·2007
Same author

Partner change and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review.

Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology·2007
Same author

A controversial tumor marker: is SM22 a proper biomarker for gastric cancer cells?

Journal of proteome research·2007
Same author

A strategy for high-throughput analysis of levosimendan and its metabolites in human plasma samples using sequential negative and positive ionization liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric detection.

Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM·2007
Same author

[Leukemic cell apoptosis induced by anti-human DR5 monoclonal antibody mDRA-6].

Xi bao yu fen zi mian yi xue za zhi = Chinese journal of cellular and molecular immunology·2007
Same author

[Infection of intervertebral space and the interventional therapy].

Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences·2007

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 17, 2025

Using Computer Vision Libraries to Streamline Nuclei Quantification
06:25

Using Computer Vision Libraries to Streamline Nuclei Quantification

Published on: June 6, 2025

388

Merging nucleus datasets by correlation-based cross-training.

Wenhua Zhang1, Jun Zhang2, Xiyue Wang2

  • 1Department of Computer Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Medical Image Analysis
|December 16, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel framework to improve nucleus classification by treating it as a multi-label problem with missing labels. This approach effectively utilizes diverse, inconsistently labeled datasets, enhancing model performance.

Keywords:
Label correlationMerging datasetsNucleus classification

More Related Videos

Exploiting Live Imaging to Track Nuclei During Myoblast Differentiation and Fusion
09:03

Exploiting Live Imaging to Track Nuclei During Myoblast Differentiation and Fusion

Published on: April 13, 2019

8.3K
Nuclei Isolation from Fresh Frozen Brain Tumors for Single-Nucleus RNA-seq and ATAC-seq
06:22

Nuclei Isolation from Fresh Frozen Brain Tumors for Single-Nucleus RNA-seq and ATAC-seq

Published on: August 25, 2020

12.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 17, 2025

Using Computer Vision Libraries to Streamline Nuclei Quantification
06:25

Using Computer Vision Libraries to Streamline Nuclei Quantification

Published on: June 6, 2025

388
Exploiting Live Imaging to Track Nuclei During Myoblast Differentiation and Fusion
09:03

Exploiting Live Imaging to Track Nuclei During Myoblast Differentiation and Fusion

Published on: April 13, 2019

8.3K
Nuclei Isolation from Fresh Frozen Brain Tumors for Single-Nucleus RNA-seq and ATAC-seq
06:22

Nuclei Isolation from Fresh Frozen Brain Tumors for Single-Nucleus RNA-seq and ATAC-seq

Published on: August 25, 2020

12.5K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Fine-grained nucleus classification is hindered by high inter-class similarity and intra-class variability, necessitating large labeled datasets.
  • Creating large-scale, consistently labeled nucleus datasets is difficult due to domain expertise requirements and existing dataset inconsistencies.
  • Current methods train models separately on each dataset, limiting overall classification performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a unified framework for nucleus classification that leverages multiple, inconsistently labeled datasets.
  • To address the challenge of missing labels across different nucleus classification datasets.
  • To improve the performance of nucleus classification models by utilizing all available annotated data.

Main Methods:

  • Formulated nucleus classification as a multi-label problem with missing labels, merging all available datasets.
  • Devised a base classification module trained on all data with sparse supervision from ground-truth labels.
  • Implemented a label correlation module to exploit relationships between different label sets and utilized cross-training with pseudo-labels.
  • Incorporated data without ground-truth labels by generating pseudo-labels.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework demonstrated substantial performance improvements over state-of-the-art methods.
  • Successfully unified and utilized multiple, inconsistently labeled nucleus classification datasets.
  • Enabled training on data with missing labels and data lacking any ground-truth labels.

Conclusions:

  • The multi-label, missing-label formulation provides an effective unified framework for nucleus classification.
  • The proposed method overcomes limitations of inconsistent labeling criteria across datasets.
  • This approach significantly enhances nucleus classification accuracy by maximizing data utilization.