Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2025

Rapid High-throughput Species Identification of Botanical Material Using Direct Analysis in Real Time High Resolution Mass Spectrometry
Published on: October 2, 2016
Dietary higenamine from Annonaceae family fruits as a possible source of unintentional doping
Renan Muniz-Santos1, Juliana Avezum2, Bichara Abidão-Neto2
1Laboratory of Protein Biochemistry, The Federal University of State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Av. Pasteur, 296 - Urca, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Abstract:
Members of the genus Aconitum have been used for millennia, both as poisons and medicines, in Eastern culture. Higenamine has non-selective beta-agonist effects, activating both β1 and β2 adrenoreceptors, and is present in a variety of plants. The World Anti-Doping Agency has banned Higenamine both in competition and out of competition. Due to the common uses of higenamine in Brazilian culture, both as medicine and food, we studied the urinary concentrations of higenamine after the consumption of fruits of the Annona genus. We evaluated whether the ingestion of these fruits has the potential to cause anti-doping code violations. We measured higenamine concentrations for a 72 h period in the urine of ten healthy, physically active males (age 20-30; weight 70-80 kg; not consuming supplements or medications) after eating a unique meal containing fruits. Fruit consumption ranges were: Carica papaya (control) 348 ± 98 g; A. muricata 450 ± 282 g; and A. squamosa 314 ± 60 g. (all mean± SD). Higenamine was measured using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry. The appearance of urinary higenamine occurred within the first 12 h after eating A. muricata (n = 3), and the maximum concentration found was 1.9 ng/mL. The ingestion of A. squamosa has also been shown to cause higenamine urinary excretion. The elimination kinetics of the subjects who ingested A. squamosa (n = 4) were different from each other. After ingestion of the control fruit, C. papaya, we detected no higenamine in the urine of any participants (n = 3). Although the kinetics varied by individuals and fruits, A. muricata ingestion produced higher higenamine excretion; however, the A. squamosa portion weighed ∼66 % of the A. muricata portion. We conclude that eating Annonaceae family fruits cause detectable higenamine excretion. Conversely, single ingestion did not reach the WADA's threshold to cause adverse analytical findings.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Physical Properties of Amines
Adrenergic Agonists: Indirect-Acting Agents
One mechanism involves depleting stored catecholamines by displacing them from synaptic vesicles. These agents, known as "displacers," are transported into vesicles at the expense of noradrenaline. Examples include amphetamine and tyramine, which lack a catechol moiety, resulting in prolonged action, improved oral...
Prevention of Further Absorption of Poison
Adrenergic Agonists: Mixed-Action Agents
Ephedrine and pseudoephedrine lack a catecholamine group, making them less susceptible to degradation by metabolic enzymes. They have increased oral bioavailability and lipophilicity, resulting in a longer duration of action. Their response is reduced by...
Antidotes
Specific antidotes operate by inhibiting the enzymes that control biochemical pathways, reducing the production of harmful metabolites.
An example of an antidote is atropine, which counteracts the detrimental effects of cholinesterase inhibitors. It achieves this by deactivating muscarinic receptors,...
Anticholinesterase Agents: Poisoning and Treatment
Irreversible agents form a strong bond with the cholinesterase enzyme, making it inactive. The breakdown of the phosphorylated enzyme is...

