Overfactoring in rating scale data: A comparison between factor analysis and item response theory.
Javier Revuelta1, Carmen Ximénez1, Noelia Minaya1
1Department of Psychology, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Frontiers in Psychology
|December 19, 2022
Summary
Skewed data in psychological measurement can cause overfactoring. The Satorra-Bentler method and graded response model (GRM) are reliable alternatives for estimating the number of factors accurately.
Area of Science:
- Educational Measurement
- Psychological Measurement
- Psychometrics
- Factor Analysis
Background:
- Traditional factor analysis models often assume normally distributed data.
- Skewed response distributions in educational and psychological measurement attenuate correlations.
- Attenuated correlations can lead to an overestimation of factors in linear factor models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the problem of overfactoring in factor analysis with skewed data.
- To compare the performance of five different factor analysis approaches under skewed conditions.
- To identify reliable methods for estimating the number of factors when data are not normally distributed.
Main Methods:
- A simulation study was conducted to evaluate factor analysis techniques.
- Five methods were compared: maximum-likelihood factor analysis (FA), categorical factor analysis (FAC) with ML and WLS estimation, Satorra-Bentler corrected chi-square, and Samejima's graded response model (GRM).
- Goodness-of-fit criteria included likelihood-ratio chi-square, parallel analysis (PA), and categorical parallel analysis (CPA).
Main Results:
- Maximum-likelihood estimation resulted in overfactoring for both linear and categorical factor models when variables were skewed.
- The Satorra-Bentler method and the graded response model (GRM) demonstrated superior reliability in estimating the correct number of factors.
- Categorical factor analysis with weighted least squares (WLS) also showed some improvement over standard ML estimation.
Conclusions:
- Standard maximum-likelihood estimation is susceptible to overfactoring with skewed psychological and educational measurement data.
- The Satorra-Bentler correction and the graded response model (GRM) are recommended as robust alternatives for factor number estimation.
- Researchers should consider these advanced methods when dealing with non-normally distributed item responses to ensure accurate factor structures.
Related Concept Videos
Factorial Design
13.1K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.1K
Response Surface Methodology
214
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
214
Two-Way ANOVA
2.7K
The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
2.7K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
273
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
273
Ratio Level of Measurement
18.7K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated....
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated....
18.7K
One-Way ANOVA
8.1K
One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
8.1K


