Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
Internal attention is the only retroactive mechanism for controlling precision in working memory
Fatih Serin1,2, Eren Günseli3
1MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. fatih.serin@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.
Humans cannot control working memory (WM) item precision independently of attention. This study found that even when attempting to enhance precision for unattended items, attention remains the primary factor influencing memory accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Human Memory
Background:
- Emerging evidence suggests humans can control the precision of information stored in working memory (WM).
- The precise neural and cognitive mechanisms underlying this control, particularly its relationship with attention, remain incompletely understood.
- Previous research indicates working memory storage may operate independently of attentional focus.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether a precision control mechanism for working memory items exists independently of internal attention.
- To experimentally contrast the effects of internal attention and precision demands on memory recall within the same trial.
- To determine if individuals can enhance the precision of unattended working memory items.
Main Methods:
- Three experiments were conducted where participants memorized two items, followed by a retro-cue directing attention to one item.
- Task difficulty was manipulated by varying target-lure similarity, with a focus on trials where difficulty was equated for attended and unattended items.
- Control measures for output interference and retro-cue effects were implemented in later experiments.
Main Results:
- Across all experiments, accuracy for the unattended item was consistently lower than for the attended item.
- Participants did not demonstrate superior precision for unattended items, even when specifically prompted to do so.
- These findings indicate that precision could not be enhanced beyond the level afforded by attentional prioritization.
Conclusions:
- The study concludes that there is no discernible precision control mechanism for working memory items that operates independently of internal attention.
- These results underscore a strong, inherent link between attentional allocation and the qualitative prioritization of information within working memory.
- The findings have significant implications for understanding the fundamental nature of working memory and its role in cognitive behaviors.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Working Memory
Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory

